SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUDHAKAR KISAN BORDE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['GAWALI AMOL K', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'GP', 'SHELKE SHIVAJI T', '']

{1}

wp11854-17

drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO.11854 OF 2017

Sudhakar Kisan Borde

PETITIONER

Age – 55 years, Occupation – Nil

R/o At – Shiregaon, Post – Khedle Parmanand

Taluka – Newasa, District - Ahmednagar

VERSUS

1.

The State of Maharashtra

RESPONDENTS

Through Hon'ble Minister

For Rural Development

Mantralaya, Mumbai-32

2.

The Divisional Commissioner,

Nashik Division, Nashik

3.

The Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar

District – Ahmednagar

Through its Chief Executive Officer

4.

The Chief Executive Officer,

Zilla Parishad Ahmednagar

District - Ahmednagar

.......

Mr. Amol K. Gawali, Advocate for the petitioner

Mr. S. P. Tiwari, AGP for respondent - State

Mr. S.T. Shelke, Advocate for respondents No. 3 and 4

.......

[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.]

DATE : 25

th SEPTEMBER, 2018

ORAL JUDGMENT :

1.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard learned

advocates for the parties finally by consent.

{2}

wp11854-17

2.

The petitioner is before this court aggrieved by orders

dated 29th May, 2017 passed by Minister for State for Rural

Development, dated 25th October, 2016 passed by Di

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top