Advocates:
['NASEEM R SHAIKH', 'PV BARDE', '', '', 'FV PATEL & AM PATHAN']

RA Nos. 48, 49/14

1

IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

REVIEW APPLICATION NOS. 48 OF 2014

IN

SECOND APPEAL NO. 426 OF 2009

Shaikh Irshad s/o. Shaikh Mukhid

....Applicant.

Versus

Shaikh Mustapha s/o. Shaikh Mukhid

and others

....Respondents.

WITH

REVIEW APPLICATION NOS. 49 OF 2014

IN

SECOND APPEAL NO. 427 OF 2009

Shaikh Irshad s/o. Shaikh Mukhid

....Applicant.

Versus

Shaikh Mustapha s/o. Shaikh Mukhid

and others

....Respondents.

Mr. N.R. Shaikh, Advocate for applicant in both matters.

Mr. P.V. Barde, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 7 in both

matters.

Mr. F.V. Patel & A.M. Pathan, Advocates for respondent Nos. 3 to 6

in RA No. 48/2014 & for respondent Nos. 3 to 5 in RA No. 49/2014.

Mr. Rafeeque Shaikh, Advocate for respondent No. 6 in RA No.

49/2014.

CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE, J.

DATED : 7th April, 2014.

RA Nos. 48, 49/14

2

ORDER :

1.

Notice to other side. The learned counsels appearing

for other side waive notice. Heard the learned counsel for the

applicant immediately in view of the nature of grievance.

2.

The main grievance of the applicant is that this Court

presided over by other Hon'ble Judge of this Court has observed in

reaso