Raju Ambadas Shinde vs The State Of Maharashtra

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
S.G. MEHARE, J
Raju Ambadas Shinde – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Shivprasad G Jadhavar
For the Respondents: Mr. K.S. Patil

Table of Content
1. application arises from drug-related charges demanding compliance with ndps. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments around non-compliance with ndps procedures justifying bail sought. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. court's considerations of previous bail applications and roles in crime. (Para 6 , 10)
4. final ruling based on unique case facts leads to dismissal of bail applications. (Para 9)

ORDER:-

1. Both applications are arising out of the same Crime bearing No.0084 of 2021 registered with Police Station Osmanabad Rural, District Osmanabad, for the offences punishable under Section 8 (c), 20(b)(ii)(c) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances, Act, 1985 (‘NDPS Act’ for short).

2. The applicants are brothers. They have claimed bail mainly because the investigation officer failed to comply with Sections 42 (1) and (2) of the NDPS Act. The learned counsel appearing for the applicants has vehemently argued that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the Crime. The applicants have been languishing in jail since 16.04.2021 and 21.02.2022. Before the charge sheet, the bail applications of the applicants were rejected by the Special Judge. Applicant Pintu Shinde had also mov

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABADS.G. MEHARE, JRaju Ambadas Shinde – AppellantVersusThe State Of Maharashtra – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
S.G. MEHARE, J
Raju Ambadas Shinde – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra – Respondent