HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
UTTAM KONDIBA BHUJBALE – Appellant
Versus
WAKORE GOVINDRAOSHESHRAO AND ORS – Respondent
WP 7782/2009
(1) WP. 7782.2009+1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 7782 OF 2009
Shri Uttam S/o Kondiba Bhujbale
Age : 29 years, Occu.: Service as
Physical Education Teacher,
R/o C/o Manik Secondary School
Chikhali (Bk.), Tq. Kinwat,
District : Nanded .. Petitioner
(Orig. Resp. no.3)
VERSUS
1. Shri Wakore S/o Govindrao Sheshrao
Age: 31 years, Occu.: Nil,
R/o Katkalamba, Tq. Kandhar,
District : Nanded
2. Late Manikrao Guruji Samajik Vikas
Sanstha, Katkalamba, Tq. Kandhar,
District : Nanded,
Through its Secretary
3. Manik Secondary School, Chikhali,
(Bk.) Tq. Kinwat, Dist. Nanded
Through its Head Master
4. The Education Officer (Secondary)
Zilla Parishad, Nanded .. Respondents
(Resp.No.1 is orig.appellant)
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 249 OF 2010
1. Late Manikrao Guruji Samajik Vikas
Sanstha, Katkalamba, Tq. Kandhar,
District : Nanded,
Through its Secretary
2. Manik Secondary School, Chikhali
(Bk.) Tq. Kinwat, Dist. Nanded
Through its Head Master .. Petitioners
(Orig. Resp. no.1 and 2)
(2) WP. 7782.2009+1
VERSUS
1. Shri Govindrao S/o Sheshrao Wakore
Age : 31 years, Occu.: Nil,
R/o Katkalamba, Tq. Kandhar
District : Nanded
2. The Education Officer (Secondary)
Zilla Parishad, Nanded
3. Shri Uttam S/o Kondiba Bhujbale
Age : 29 years, Occu.: Service
as Physical Education Teacher,
R/o C/o Manik Secondary School
Chikhali (Bk.), Tq. Kinwat
District Nanded .. Respondents
(Resp.No.2 and 3 are
Orig. Resp. no.4 and 3)
(IN W.P. NO. 7782 OF 2009)
Mr. S.C. Bhosale, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. R.J. Godbole, Advocate for the respondent no.1
Mr. V.P. Golewar, Advocate for the respondent nos.2 and 3
Mr. S.V. Kurundkar, Addl. G.P. for the respondent-State
(IN W.P. NO. 249 OF 2010)
Mr. V.P. Golewar, Advocate for the Petitioners
Mr. R.J. Godbole, Advocate for the respondent no.1
Mr. S.V. Kurundkar, Addl. G.P. for the respondent-State
Mr. S.C. Bhosale, Advocate for the respondent no.3
...
CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.
DATE OF RESERVING
THE JUDGMENT : 18TH AUGUST, 2010
DATE OF PRONOUNCING
THE JUDGMENT : 3RD SEPTEMBER, 2010
JUDGMENT:-
1.
Both the Petitions are being decided
together inasmuch as they are filed against same
(3) WP. 7782.2009+1
judgment and order rendered by the School Tribunal,
Latur in Appeal bearing no. 74 of 2007. The appeal
was preferred by the respondent no.1. By the
impugned judgment and order, his Appeal came to be
allowed and he was directed to be reinstated in
service as Physical Education Teacher alongwith full
backwages and consequential benefits. First Writ
Petition (Writ Petition no. 7782 of 2009) is filed by
petitioner Uttam Bhujbale who was appointed on the
post allegedly vacated by the respondent no.1, as
Physical Education Teacher and is likely to be
removed as a result of the impugned judgment whereas
second Writ Petition (Writ Petition no.249 of 2010)
is filed by the educational institution and the
school who are required to comply with the directions
issued by the School Tribunal vide the impugned
judgment.
2.
The respondent no.1 had challenged the
termination order dated 5.12.2007 whereby his
services as Physical Education Teacher and Incharge
Headmaster came to an end w.e.f. 5th January, 2008.
(4)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.