SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
NISHANT BAPURAO GAIKWAD – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAH – Respondent


1 Cr. Appln. no. 4092.09

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4092 OF 2009

1.

Nishant S/o Bapurao Gaikwad

Age 20 years,Occu.Education,

2.

Jairam S/o Dattatrya Kaldate,

Age 23 years,Occup.Agriculture,

3.

Sinath S/o Vithal More,

Age 30 years,occup.Agrigulure,

4.

Nitin S/o Vithal More,

Age 30 years,occup.Agrigulure,

5.

Dattatray S/o Shivaji Dongare,

Age 30 years,Occup.Agriculture,

6.

Santosh S/p Popatl Pisal,

Age 32 years,occup.Agriculture,

7.

Malhari S/o Pandurang Gaikwad,

Age 34 years,occup.Agriculture,

8.

Sudhir S/o subhash Pisal,

Age 23 years,occup.Education,

All R/o Rajuri,Ta.Jamkhed,

Distarict Ahmednagar

...Applicants

V E R S U S

1.

The State of Maharashtra

(Copy to be served on PP

High Court of Bombay Bench

at Aurangabad )

2.

The District Superintendent of

Police,Ahmednagar.

2 Cr. Appln. no. 4092.09

3.

The Police Station Officer,

Jamkhed Police Station,

Jamkhed,District Ahmednagar.

...Respondents

WITh

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4156 OF 2009

1.

Bhau S/o Hanu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top