SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BANDU RANGNATH HARER AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER – Respondent
APPLN 4735/2013



-:(1):-

4735-13NANR

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION

Office

Notes,

Office

Memoranda

of

Coram,

appearance,

Court's

orders or directions and

Registrar's orders.

Court's or Judge's orders.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4735 OF 2013

WITH APPLN/4736/2013 WITH APPLN/5028/2013 IN

APPLN/4735/2013 WITH APPLN/5029/2013 IN

APPLN/4736/2013

BANDU RANGNATH HARER AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. V.D.Hon, Advocate h/f Mr. Garud

N.C.

APP for Respondents: Mr. R. P. Phatake.

Advocate to assist A.P.P.: Mr. N. B. Narwade.

***

CORAM: T. V. NALAWADE, J.

DATED: 8th OCTOBER,2013

PER COURT:

1.

The first two applications are filed

for anticipatory bail. The other two

applications are filed for permission to

assist learned A.P.P.

2.

Learned counsel Narwade was allowed to

assist learned A.P.P. Thus the last two

applications are disposed of as allowed.

3.

Learned counsel for the Applicant

submitted that during pendency of the

proceeding, Applicant No.3 Badrinath from

-:(2):-

4735-13NANR

first proceeding came to be arrested. So,

his application is disposed of as

infructuous.

4.

Learned counsel for the Applicants

submitted that, on instructions, he is

withdrawing the Application for Applicant

No.2 Somnath from the first proceeding and

the application of Bhau alias Devidas

Yelwande from the second proceeding. So,

the application of Applicant No.2 Somanath

from the first proceeding is disposed of as

withdrawn and the Criminal Application No.

4736 of 2013 is also disposed of as

withdrawn.

5.

This Court has already considered the

allegations made as against Applicant Nos.

1 Bandu and Applicant No.4 Maroti Chothe

from the first proceeding.

Main

allegations are against different persons.

No active role is attributed to these two

applicants though it is contended that they

were in the company of the main accused.

Considering the possibility of exaggeration

-:(3):-

4735-13NANR

this Court holds that bail can be granted

to Applicant Nos.1 and 4 from the first

proceeding.

6.

In the result, the application No.4735

of 2013 is allowed to the extent of

Applicant No.1 Bandu and Applicant No.4

Maroti Chothe. Interim relief granted in

their favour is confirmed.

[T. V. NALAWADE, J.]

Dt.08/10/2013

ans/4735-13NANR

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top