BOMBAY HIGH COURT
PRAKASH D. NAIK, J
Vinayak Uddhavrao Pandit – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of conspiracy and forgery in property transactions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments for necessity of bail and claims of false implicating. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's observation on the necessity of custodial interrogation. (Para 11 , 12) |
ORDER :
1. The applicants are apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No. 300/2021 registered with Harsul Police Station, District Aurangabad for the offence punishable under Section 419 , 420, 463, 464, 468, 471, 474, 120-B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code . The First Information Report (for short “F.I.R.”) was registered on 1st September 2021.
2. The case of the prosecution is that in 1991, the complainant, Kantarao Bankar, Kanhaiyalal Jaiswal had purchased the property viz; land at Survey No. 157/01, 1 Hectare 70 Aar situated at Harsul. The said land was owned by Raising Khemsing Harne. Registered Isar Pawati was executed on 23rd August 1991. The consideration for the said transaction was Rs. 96,000/-. (3) Rs.15,000/- were given at the time of execution of Isar Pawati and the balance amount was to be given at the time of registration of document. It was also agreed to purchase 34 Hectare 58
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.