SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
MOHD. SAJID MOHD. DAWOOD – Appellant
Versus
LEELABAI SHANTILAL MUTHIYAN – Respondent


Advocates:
['MEHTA PUNIT S', 'PATNI PRAMOD FULCHAND', '', 'Sole Respondent is served']

{1}

WP-11281-2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 11281OF 2021

Mohd. Sajid s/o Modh. Dawood

Age- 47 years, Occ- Business

R/o. Chamba Chouk, Metro Tower,

Aurangabad, Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad.

PETITIONER

[Orig. Plaintiff]

VERSUS

Leelabai Shantilal Muthiyan

Age- 71 years, Occ- Household,

R/o. 119, Samarth Nagar, Aurangabad

Tq & Dist. Aurangabad.

RESPONDENT

.......

Mr. Punit S. Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Pramod F. Patni, Advocate for Respondent.

.......

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.]

RESERVED ON: 7

th JULY, 2022

PRONOUNCED ON- 26

th JULY, 2022

ORDER :

1.

The challenge in this petition is to the order dated

18.08.2021, below Exhibit-66 in Special Civil Suit No. 182/2017,

passed by the learned 9th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division,

Aurangabad, thereby rejecting the application filed by the

petitioner seeking direction under Order XVIII Rule 3 of Code of

Civil Procedure.

Bhagyawant Punde

{2}

WP-11281-2021

2.

The petitioner/original plaintiff filed suit for specific

performance of contract and injunction. The su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top