SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DATTATRAY MOHAN GIRI THROUGH HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY LAXMIBAI DATTATRAY GIRI – Appellant
Versus
SHANKAR PANDITRAO PATIL AND OTHERS – Respondent


941.WP.11280.21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO.11280 OF 2021

DATTATRAY MOHAN GIRI THROUGH HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY

LAXMIBAI DATTATRAY GIRI

VERSUS

SHANKAR PANDITRAO PATIL AND OTHERS

...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. N.J. Patil

...

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE

: 12.10.2021

PER COURT :

Heard the learned advocate Mr. N.J. Patil for the petitioner.

2.

The petitioner is the original plaintiff who is claiming perpetual

injunction restraining the respondents defendants from obstructing his

possession over the suit property.

3.

By moving Application (Exhibit-88) at his request the trial court

appointed TILR Ausa as a Court Commissioner for carrying out

measurement and for fixing the boundaries. Accordingly the TILR carried

out the measurements and submitted a report inter alia showing that it is

the petitioner who is in possession of a portion of respondent'

s land. Since

by the order the Court Commissioner TILR was directed to merely fix the

boundaries but he having shown the encroachment, the petitioner made

another application requesting the court to direct a remeasurment by the

TILR. That Application was rejected. He ther

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top