SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KARANSING KACHRUSING KAKAS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['SHINGARE K F', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'G P', 'R/ SERVED', 'PALODKAR DEODATT P']

wp8702-12

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO.8702 OF 2012

Karansing s/o Kachrusing Kakas

Age : 47 years, Occu-Agriculture

R/o Karnapura, Cantonment,

Aurangabad.

… PETITIONER

Versus

1]

The State of Maharashtra

(Copy to be served on Govt.

Pleader, High Court of Bombay,

Bench at Aurangabad.)

2]

Additional Commissiner

Aurangabad

3]

Additional Collector

Aurangabad

4]

Sub Divisional Officer,

Vaijapur, Dist.Aurangabad

5]

Tahsildar,

Gangapur,Tq. Gangapur

Dist.Aurangabad.

6]

Vijay s/o Uttamrao Deshmukh

wp8702-12

-2-

Age 54 years, Occu-Business

R/o Matruchhaya Municipal

Colony, Kileark, Aurangabad

7]

Vikas s/o Uttamrao Deshmukh

Age 51 years, occu-Agri

N-5, H-35, Satyam Nagar

CIDCO, Aurangabad.

.. RESPONDENTS

….

Mr.K.F.Shingare Adv. for petitioner

Mr.P.S.Patil,AGP for respondents No.1 to 5

Mr.D.P.Palodkar, Adv. for Respondent no.6.

Respondent no.7 served and absent

CORAM : V.L.ACHLIYA,J.

RESERVED ON : 20TH APRIL,2016

PRONOUNCED ON : 6th May, 2016

ORAL JUDGMENT :

Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of pa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top