SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BALAPRASAD BRIJILAL SARDA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['DHONGADE SURESH D', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'NO CAVEAT', 'GP']

1 wp 10198.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 10198 OF 2016

Balaprasad Brijilal Sarda

.. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others

.. Respondents

Mrs. Suchita Amit Ahongade h/f Shri Suresh D. Dhongade,

Advcoate for the Petitioner.

Shri P. S. Patil, Addl. G. P. for the Respondents.

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &

S. M. GAVHANE, JJ.

DATE

: 10

th October, 2017

PER COURT :

1.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

tribunal failed to consider that no departmental enquiry was

initiated against the petitioner. The petitioner being permanent

employee could not have been dismissed without conducting

departmental enquiry. The learned counsel further submits that

in the year 2000 he had some dispute with the Secretary as such

become mentally weak and could not attend the duties. On 20th

July 2001, the petitioner went to join duties but was not allowed.

On 7.9.2003, the petitioner was directed to appear before the

medical board for medical examination. The petitioner appeared

2 wp 10198.16

for the me

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top