SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PUSHPA ALIAS AMRUTA ATUL PATIL – Appellant
Versus
ATUL ANGADRAO PATIL AND OTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['CHALAK AMOL B', 'R', 'ARE FORMAL PARTIES', '', 'MORE ABHIJIT S ADV']

1

MCA 240.2019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

922 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.240 OF 2019

PUSHPA ALIAS AMRUTA ATUL PATIL

VERSUS

ATUL ANGADRAO PATIL AND OTHERS

...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Chalak Amol B.

Advocate for Respondent 1 : Mr. More Abhiit S.

...

CORAM : V.K. JADHAV, J.

Dated: February 11, 2021

...

PER COURT :-

1.

Leave to delete names of respondent nos. 2 and 3.

Deletion be carried out forthwith.

2.

By consent of the parties, heard fnally at

admission stage.

3.

This is about the transfer of the application fled

by the respondent-husband under the provisions of the

Guardians and Wards Act seeking custody of the child.

Respondent-husband has fled the said application

bearing Civil M.A. No.61 of 2019 which is pending on the

fle of Additional District Judge, Barshi. The applicantn

aaa/-

2

MCA 240.2019.odt

wife resides with her parents at Morewadi, Tq.

Ambajogai, District Beed.

2.

Learned counsel submits that the applicant-wife

has no independent source of income and the said

daughter is al

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top