SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SHREE RENUKA SUGARS LIMITED PATHRI THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MOHAN T PATIL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent


1 wp 11901.2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

959 WRIT PETITION NO.11901 OF 2021

SHREE RENUKA SUGARS LIMITED PATHRI THROUGH ITS

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MOHAN T. PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

...

Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. V. D. Salunke

I/c. GP for Respondents/State: Mr. D. R. Kale

...

CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA &

R. N. LADDHA, JJ.

DATE:

26th OCTOBER, 2021

PER COURT:

1.

Mr. Salunke, learned Advocate for the

petitioner submits that the petitioner has paid

the FRP amount as per the base rate of 10% as

fixed by the Central Government. The Commissioner

of Sugar has decided the recovery rate as 10.44%,

whereas, Regional Joint Director has decided the

recovery rate as 10.69%. There is confusion in the

same, as such, the Government has appointed 9

member Committee. The matter is subjudiced before

it. As the petitioner has already paid the base

FRP price there is no reason for withholding the

2 wp 11901.2021

license of the petitioner on the ground of non-

payment of the FRP.

2.

Mr. Kale learned In-charge Government Pleader

submits that as the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top