SHREE RENUKA SUGARS LIMITED PATHRI THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MOHAN T PATIL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent
1 wp 11901.2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
959 WRIT PETITION NO.11901 OF 2021
SHREE RENUKA SUGARS LIMITED PATHRI THROUGH ITS
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MOHAN T. PATIL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. V. D. Salunke
I/c. GP for Respondents/State: Mr. D. R. Kale
...
CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
R. N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATE:
26th OCTOBER, 2021
PER COURT:
1.
Mr. Salunke, learned Advocate for the
petitioner submits that the petitioner has paid
the FRP amount as per the base rate of 10% as
fixed by the Central Government. The Commissioner
of Sugar has decided the recovery rate as 10.44%,
whereas, Regional Joint Director has decided the
recovery rate as 10.69%. There is confusion in the
same, as such, the Government has appointed 9
member Committee. The matter is subjudiced before
it. As the petitioner has already paid the base
FRP price there is no reason for withholding the
2 wp 11901.2021
license of the petitioner on the ground of non-
payment of the FRP.
2.
Mr. Kale learned In-charge Government Pleader
submits that as the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.