SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SURYEKANT MARUTI KOKATE LRS PUSHPAMALA AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
LAXMIKANT RAMCHANDRA THOMBRE – Respondent


Advocates:
['SALUNKE V D', 'CHAPALGAONKAR S G', '', 'FOR R /SOLE']

(1)

919-wp-8480-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO.8480 OF 2013

SURYEKANT MARUTI KOKATE THROUGH LRS PUSHPAMALA

SURYEKANT KOKATE AND OTHERS

..PETITIONERS

VERSUS

LAXMIKANT RAMCHANDRA THOMBRE

..RESPONDENT

Mr. Sujit Patil h/f Mr. V. D. Salunke, Advocate for

the Petitioners.

Mr. S. g. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for sole

Respondent.

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.

DATED : 14th JANUARY, 2022.

PER COURT:-

1.

The respondent is original plaintiff. The

application Exhibit-5 before the Trial Court in

Regular Civil Suit No.154/2007 filed by plaintiff

is allowed and defendants are clamped with

injunction on 01.04.2008. The defendant no.1 it

appears died in the year 2010 and defendant no.4

died in the year 2009. The legal heirs it appears

are brought on record of defendant nos.1 and 4 with

the permission of the Court.

2.

The plaintiff claimed disobedience of the

order of injunction. As such, filed application

under Order 39 Rule 2-A of the Code of Civil

Procedure. However, in the application deceased

defendant nos.1 and 4 were arrayed. The plaintiff

filed application for adding names of the legal

heirs of deceased defe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top