Govind s/o Baliram Mugle vs Govind s/o Narsingrao Kunale

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
K.K. SONAWANE, J
Govind s/o Baliram Mugle – Appellant
Versus
Govind s/o Narsingrao Kunale – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. A. N. Subnis, Mr. V.D. Gunale
For the Respondents: Mr. Nitin Jagdale, Mr. V.D. Salunke

Table of Content
1. the appeal challenges the termination of memberships based on alleged procedural invalidity. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. the court confirmed the legitimacy of the meeting leading to membership changes. (Para 4 , 6 , 19)
3. procedural adherence concerning member notice requirements is critical. (Para 5 , 13 , 14 , 15)

JUDGMENT :-

1. This is an first appeal filed under section 72(4) of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950 (for short “Act of 1950”) by the appellants to agitate validity and legality of the findings expressed by the learned Assistant Charity Commissioner, Latur ( for short “ACC”) in the Inquiry of change report No. 313 of 1997 under section 22 of the Act of 1950. The Principal District Judge, Latur after exercising the powers under section 72 of the Act of 1950 upset the findings of the learned Joint Charity Commissioner, Latur (for short “JCC”) in revision No. 17 of 2004 and restore the decision of learned ACC under section 22 of the Act of 1950. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order of the Principal District Judge for restoration of status-quo ante in regard to change report No. 313 of 1997, the appellants preferred the present appeal to redress their g

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABADK.K. SONAWANE, JGovind s/o Baliram Mugle – AppellantVersusGovind s/o Narsingrao Kunale – Respondent

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
K.K. SONAWANE, J
Govind s/o Baliram Mugle – Appellant
Versus
Govind s/o Narsingrao Kunale – Respondent