HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
MANDODHARI UTTAM MULE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent
WP 11256/2016
['MATHPATI SHIVKUMAR K', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'NO CAVEAT', 'GP', 'GOVT PLEADER']
WP-9933-2016 aw wps judg.odt
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.9933 OF 2016
Kamalbai W/o Venkatrao Nipanikar,
Age 68 years, Occ. Housewife,
R/o: A/p – Nipanikar Niwas,
Signal Camp, Latur.
...Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State of Maharashtra
Through its Secretary,
Finance Department,
Mantralaya, Mumbai – 400032.
2.
The Accountant General – II (A & E)
Pension Wing Old Building
In front of Ravi Bhavan,
Nagpur.
3.
The Education Ofcer,
Z.P. Secondary,
Latur.
4.
The Head Master,
Shree. Marwadi Rajasthan Vidhyalaya,
Latur, Tq – Dist – Latur.
...Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.12308 OF 2016
Smt. Savita w/o Gangaram Chimane,
Age 45 years, Occ. Household,
R/o: Ridhi-Sidhi Apartment,
Samarth Nagar, Jalna.
...Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State of Maharashtra
(Copy to be served upon G.P.
High Court Bombay bench at Aurangabad)
2.
The Accountant General – II (A & E)
Maharashtra, Nagpur.
3.
Education Ofcer (Secondary),
Zilla Parishad, Jalna.
4.
Head Master, Machodhari,
WP-9933-2016 aw wps judg.odt
(2)
Vidhyalaya, Ambad,
Tq. Ambad, Dist – Jalna.
5.
Smt. Sadhana w/o Gangaram Shinde,
Age: 50 years, Occu: Household & Agril.,
R/o. Mahankala, Tq. Ambad, Dist. Jalna.
...Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.11256 OF 2016
Mandodhari W/o Uttam Mule,
Age 65 years, Occ. Housewife,
R/o: At: Birsingpur, Post: Dewulghat,
Tq. & Dist. Buldhana
...Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State of Maharashtra
Through its Secretary,
Finance Department,
Mantralaya, Mumbai – 400032.
2.
The State of Maharashtra
Through its Principal Secretary,
Agriculture, Dairy Development, Animal Husbandry,
and Fisheries Department,
Mantralaya, Mumbai – 400032.
3.
The Accountant General – II (A & E)
Pension Wing Old Building
In front of Ravi Bhavan,
Nagpur.
4.
The Divisional Joint Director,
Agricultural Ofcer,
Division, Pune.
5.
The Joint Director,
Agricultural Department,
Aurangabad.
Tq. And Dist. Aurangabad.
6.
The District Superintendent Agricultural Ofcer,
Jalna, Tq. & Dist. Jalna.
7.
The Sub Divisional Agricultural/
Soil Conservation Ofce,
Bhokardhan, Tq. Bhokardhan,
Dist. Jalna.
WP-9933-2016 aw wps judg.odt
(3)
8.
Taluka Agricultural Ofcer,
Bhokardhan, Tq. Bhokardhan,
Dist. Jalna.
...Respondents
…
Mr. V.D. Salunke, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. P.R. Katneshwarkar h/f Mr. S.K. Mathpati, Advocate for the
Petitioner in WP/11256/2016.
Mr. D.R. Irale Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner in WP/12308/2016.
Mr. S.B. Yawalkar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 (Respondent Nos.1
to 8 in WP/11256/2016).
Mr. S.S. Tope, Advocate for Respondent No.4 in WP/12308/2016.
Mr. R.S. Shinde, Advocate for Respondent No.5 in WP/12308/2016.
...
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &
S.G. MEHARE, J.J.
DATED : 28th SEPTEMBER, 2021
PRONOUNCED ON : 28th OCTOBER, 2021
JUDGMENT (PER S.G. MEHARE, J.):-
1.
Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard fnally by
the consent of the parties.
2.
In these writ petitions, the petitioners are widows. They had
performed the second marriage during the subsistence of the frst
marriage of their husbands.
3.
All the petitioners are claiming the same relief of family
pension on the death of their husbands under rule 116 (6) (a) (1) of the
Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.
4.
The brief facts of each case are as under :-
(a) In Writ Petition No.9933 of 2016, the petitioner married her
husband since his frst wife did not conceive until 1961. She has
delivered two female and two male children out of wedlock. The
WP-9933-2016 aw wps judg.odt
(4)
frst wife of her husband predeceased her after his retirement.
After the death of the frst wife, her husband submitted a revised
pension proposal and nominated her for family pension. The
revised family pension proposal was sent to respondent no.2, the
Accountant General, Nagpur. In the meantime, the pension was
revised. On 29.02.2016, her husband died. She submi