HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
JANARDHAN KAMLAKAR NAWALE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
ABA 1308/2021
ABA-1308-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1308 OF 2021
Janardhan S/o Kamlakar Nawale
… Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
… Respondent
.…
Mr. K. N. Shermale, Advocate for applicant
Mr. R. B. Bagul, APP for respondent - State
.…
CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT, J.
DATED : 24th FEBRUARY, 2022
O R D E R :-
.
This is an application for anticipatory bail. The applicant
claims to have apprehension of arrest in connection with Crime
No.0374/2021, registered with Akole Police Station, Taluka Akole,
District Ahmednagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 326,
323, 504, 506 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code (IPC).
2.
The First Information Report (FIR) was lodged on
25.09.2021. It has been averred in the FIR that the informant has
four flats in ‘
Shreya Residency’. The flats have been let out on rent.
The informant would visit ‘Shreya Residency’ for receiving rent each
month. The informant also constructed a building ‘Sai Residency’.
1 of 5
(( 2 ))
ABA-1308-2021
The construction work thereof was given to the applicant herein.
There was some oral wrangle between him and the applicant over
the work of construction.
It is further alleged that the informant had been to
‘
Shreya Residency’ on 25.02.2021 by 5.00 p.m. His friend Ramesh
and a wire-man of the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution
Company Limited, had accompanied him. Electricity supply of his
flat was disconnected. He had been there to reconnect the same. The
informant and the wire-man were engaged in reconnecting the
electricity supply wires. The applicant came there and pulled the
electricity supply wire from the meter. The informant asked him not
to do so. The applicant, thereupon, abused and manhandled the
informant and left. The informant contacted his brother on cellphone
to report of the incident. The applicant came in a while with an iron
rod. He assaulted the informant on the right wrist and waist with the
iron rod. The informant’s friend rescued him. The applicant abused
and gave threats to the life of the informant.
3.
Heard.
Learned Advocate for the applicant would submit that no
incident as alleged in the FIR did take place. There was an
2 of 5
(( 3 ))
ABA-1308-2021
agreement executed between the applicant and the father of the
informant for development of a land. Some flats were allotted to the
father of the informant. There was a dispute between the applicant
and the informant over the construction. One Police Officer, by name
Wagh, is instrumental to get the FIR registered against the applicant
at the instance of the informant. The Police Officer Wagh was caught
accepting a bribe. The applicant herein was complainant in the said
case. Since then, the police officer has been harassing the applicant.
He has ensured that number of crimes were registered against the
applicant herein. According to the learned Advocate, the
investigation of the crime might have been over. The informant had
not been admitted to hospital. The certificate regarding fracture of
the wrist was issued by a private hospital. The applicant is ready to
abide by any conditions the Court may like to impose. He, therefore,
urged for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant.
4.
The learned APP would, on the other hand, submit that
the applicant has criminal antecedents. Number of crimes have been
registered against him. Proceedings for his externment have also
been initiated. Medico legal certificate has been issued by the
Government Hospital. The X-ray film does indicate the informant to
3 of 5
(( 4 ))
ABA-1308-2021
have wrist fracture. As such, serious offence punishable under
Section 326 IPC has prima-facie been made out against the
applicant. He, therefore, urged for rejection of the application.
5.
Considered the submissions advanced. Perused the FIR
and the documents relied on.
The FIR has been lodged within three hours of the
incident. The informant was medically screened at Rura