HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HARSHA PRADEEP PATIL – Appellant
Versus
SAYANKABAI RAGHO PATIL AND OTHERS – Respondent
WP 271/2016
1 WP 271 of 2916
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Writ Petition No.271 of 2016
Harsha Pradeep Patil.
.. Petitioner.
Versus
Sayankabai Ragho Patil & Others. .. Respondents.
--------
Shri. M.M. Bhokarikar, Advocate, for petitioner.
Shri. P.P. Dhorde & Smt. V.P. Dhorde, Advocates, for
respondent Nos.1 to 5.
----------
CORAM: T.V. NALAWADE, J.
DATE : 13 OCTOBER 2016
ORDER:
1)
The petition is filed to challenge the order
made on Exhibit 43 from Regular Civil Suit No.181/2012
which is pending in the Court of the Civil Judge, Junior
Division, Jalgaon. The said suit is filed by the present
petitioner for relief of partition of joint Hindu family
property against brother-in-law and others. Husband of
the petitioner is dead and so she has claimed the share of
her husband from the joint Hindu family property. The
2 WP 271 of 2916
application at Exhibit 43 was filed by the defendants for
rejection of plaint on the ground that present petitioner,
plaintiff has not paid requisite court fees on the claim.
The petitioner has not paid court fees as she is claiming
that she is exempted from the payment of Court fees in
view of the Government Notifications issued in this
regard. The trial Court has held that the subject matter of
the suit, the relief of partition, is not covered by the said
Government Notifications and so the application is
allowed and the petitioner is directed to pay court fees.
Both the sides are heard.
2)
Both the sides placed reliance on some
reported cases in which there is interpretation of the two
notifications issued by the State Government. The
notifications are as under :-
"REVENUE AND FORESTS DEPARTMENT
Mantralaya, Bombay 400032, dated 1st October, 1994.
Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959.
No. STP. 1094/CR-859/M-1 – Whereas, the Government
of Maharashtra has recently announced a policy with a
view to promote the welfare of the women;
And whereas, the same welfare policy for women, inter
alia, provides for exemption of Court fees for women
3 WP 271 of 2916
litigants in cases relating to maintenance, property
right, violence and divorce;
And whereas, section 46 of the Bombay Court Fees Act,
1959 (Bom. XXXVI of 1959), empowers the State
Government by notification in the Official Gazette to
reduce or to remit any of the fees mentioned in the
First and Second Schedules to that Act;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
section 46 of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 (Bom.
XXXVI of 1959), the Government of Maharashtra
hereby remits the fees payable by women litigants on
any the plaints, applications, petitions, Memorandum
of appeals or any other documents specified in the
First and Second Schedules to the said Act, to be filed
in any Civil, Family or Criminal Courts in respect of
cases relating to (a) maintenance, (b) property disputes
(c) violence and (d) divorce.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Maharashtra.
HARSHAWARDHAN GAJBHIYE
Deputy Secretary to Government."
********
"REVENUE AND FORESTS DEPARTMENT
Mantralaya, Bombay 400032, dated 23rd March, 2000
Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959.
No. S. 30/2000/673/CR-199/M-1 - in exercise of the
powers conferred by section 46 of the Bombay Court
Fees Act, 1959 (Bom. XXXVI of 1959), the Government
of Maharashtra hereby amends the Government
Notification, Revenue and Forests Department No.
STP.1094/CR-859/M-1 dated the 1st October, 1994, as
follows:-
In the said Notification, the following Explanation
shall be added at the end, namely:-
4 WP 271 of 2916
“Explanation – The expression “property disputes”
shall mean property disputes a