SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VILAS RAMRAO NATU – Appellant
Versus
VIKAS DOGLA CHAVAN AND OTHERS – Respondent


- 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO.11898 OF 2018

Vikas s/o Ramrao Natu,

Age-53 years, Occu-Agriculture,

R/o Subashnagar, Kinwat,

Tq.Kinwat, Dist.Nanded

-- PETITIONER

VERSUS

1.

Vikas s/o Dogla Chavan,

Age-39 years, Occu-Agriculturist,

2.

Ulhas s/o Dogla Chavan,

Age-42 years, Occu-Agriculturist,

3.

Prakash s/o Dogla Chavan,

Age-36 years, Occu-Agriculturist,

4.

Smt.Subhabai w/o Dogla Chavan,

Age-63 years, Occu-Hosuehold,

All r/o Bendi (Tanda), Tq.Kinwat,

District Nanded.

-- RESPONDENTS

Mr.A.A.Mukhedkar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.R.R.Shaikh, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 4.

( CORAM : Ravindra V.Ghuge, J.)

DATE : 07/03/2019

ORAL JUDGMENT :

1.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the

consent of the parties.

khs/MARCH 2019/11898-d

- 2 -

2.

The petitioner/original plaintiff in RCS No.16/2010 is

aggrieved by the order dated 10/04/2018 passed by the Trial Court

below Exh.127 thereby refusing to exhibit an original sale deed which

is said to be registered at Entry No.898 and which is dated

15/06/1982.

3.

The contention of the petitioner is that he has referred to the

said

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top