SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SANJAY SHANTILAL JAIN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA and ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['BAGDIYA VISHAL A', 'COPY SERVED ON PP', '', 'P P', 'TANDALE P R']

1

CRI WP 1324.2015.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1324 OF 2015

SANJAY SHANTILAL JAIN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS.

...

Adv. for Petitioner : Mr.R N Dhorde Sr. Counsel i/b V A

Bagdiya

APP for Respondent Nos. 1,3,4 : Mr P G Borade

Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr P R Tandale

...

CORAM : V.K. JADHAV, J.

Dated: August 25, 2016

...

PER COURT :-

1.

Being aggrieved by the order passed below Exh.1

in Criminal Misc. Application No.422 of 2014 by the

Judicial Magistrate First Class, Udgir and the order

passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir dated

19.11.2014 in Criminal Revision Application No.22/2014,

the original applicant has preferred this writ petition.

2.

Brief facts, giving rise to the present writ are as

follows :-

a]

On the basis of the complaint lodged by Seed

Officer, Crime No.153/2014 for the offence punishable

under sections 419, 420, 468, 469, 109, 114 of the

2

CRI WP 1324.2015.odt

Indian Penal Code and Section 7 (a), 7 (b) and 19 of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top