HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
NETAJI FULCHAND DABADE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent
WP 10469/2015
['JADHAVAR PRATAP V', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'BADE PATIL K D']
1
WP NO.10434 of 2015group
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 10434 OF 2015
Shubhangi Sambhaji Waghmode,
Age : 25 years, Occu.: Service,
R/o. Omerga, Tq. Omerga,
Dist. Osmanabad.
..PETITIONER.
VERSUS
1)
The State of Maharashtra,
Tribal Development Department,
Through its Secretary,
Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.
2)
The Scheduled Tribe Certificate,
Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad.
Through its Deputy Director / Member.
3)
The Chief Executive Officer,
Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad.
4)
The Deputy Chief Executive Officer,
Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad.
5)
The Block Development Officer,
Panchayat Samittee, Omerga,
Tq. Omerga, dist. Osmanabad.
..RESPONDENTS.
...
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.10469 OF 2015
Netaji S/o Fulchand Dabade
Age : 30 years, Occu.: Service,
R/o. Karanjkheda,
Tq. & Dist. Osmanabad.
...PETITIONERS.
2
WP NO.10434 of 2015group
VERSUS
1)
The State of Maharashtra,
Tribal Development Department,
Through its Secretary,
Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.
2)
The Scheduled Tribe Certificate,
Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad.
Through its Deputy Director / Member.
3)
The Chief Executive Officer,
Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad.
4)
The Deputy Chief Executive Officer,
Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad.
5)
The Block Development Officer,
Panchayat Samittee, Lohara,
Tq. Omerga, dist. Osmanabad.
..RESPONDENTS.
...
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.10476 OF 2015
Balaji S/o Hanmantrao Nalmale
Age : 26 years, Occu: Service,
R/o. Chincholi (B), Tq. Nilanga,
Dist. Latur....PETITIONERS.
VERSUS
1)
The State of Maharashtra,
Tribal Development Department,
Through its Secretary,
Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.
2)
The Scheduled Tribe Certificate,
Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad.
Through its Deputy Director / Member.
3)
The Chief Executive Officer,
Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad.
3
WP NO.10434 of 2015group
4)
The Deputy Chief Executive Officer,
Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad.
5)
The Block Development Officer,
Panchayat Samittee, Omerga,
Tq. Omerga, dist. Osmanabad.
..RESPONDENTS.
...
Mr. Pratap V. Jadhavar, Advocate for Petitioners;
Mr. N.B. Patil, AGP for Respondent No.1 State;
Mr. P.S.Patil, Mr. Ashok Tele, and Mr.K.D. Bade
Patil, Advocates for Respondent No.2.
Mr. P.P.Dama, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 to 5.
...
CORAM: R.M.BORDE
AND
P.R.BORA, JJ.
DATED : 27th October, 2015.
...
ORAL JUDGMENT: ( Per R.M.Borde, J )
1)
The petitioners claim to belong to Koli Mahadeo
Sheduled Tribe. They have been appointed as a Gram Sevak
in Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad, as against vacancies available
for Scheduled Tribe category candidates.
2.
The grievance of the petitioners is that, as a result of
their failure to tender validation certificate, the employer i.e.
the Zilla Parishad has withheld the monthly salary admissible to
them and has also not considered their claim for regularization
on completion of three years' service as contractual Gram
4
WP NO.10434 of 2015group
Sevaks.
It is the contention of the petitioners that, as per the
policy laid down by the State Government, on satisfactory
completion of period of three years' on the post of contractual
Gram Sevak, the employee is entitled to be continued on the
said post, as regular employee and is also eligible to draw
salary in the prescribed pay scale.
3.
In the facts and circumstances of this case, this
petition can be disposed of with direction to respondent no.2
Scrutiny Committee to decide the validation claim presented by
the petitioners to the Committee as expeditiously as possible,
and preferably within a period of eight months from today, and
it is accordingly directed.
4.
Learned Counsel appearing for the Zilla Parishad
makes a statement, on instructions, that the claims of the
petitioners for regularization and in respect of payment of
salary in the prescribed pay scale and release of arrears of
back-wages would be considered within a period of three weeks
from today.
In view of th