HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
MEERATAI KALYANRAO RENGE AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent
WP 1850/2022
['Ghatol Patil Shahaji B', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'PATHAK ANIRUDDHA S']
1
907 WP.1850.22 n ca.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
907 WRIT PETITION NO. 1850 OF 2022
AND
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16261 OF 2022
IN WP/1850/2022
MEERATAI KALYANRAO RENGE AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA,
THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioners/Applicants : Mr. Shahaji B. Ghatol Patil.
AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. S. G. Sangle.
...
CORAM :
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &
SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE :
06th December, 2022.
Per Court:
1.
The petitioners have a statutory remedy in the form of
Section 154 read with sub-section 2A of the Maharashtra Co-operative
Societies Act, 1960.
2.
This petition is circulated for the first time today. The
learned advocate for the petitioners is unable to take instructions from
the petitioners for withdrawal of this petition.
3.
The petitioners seek to challenge the certificate issued
under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act.
Admittedly, the proceedings under Section 154 have not been initiated.
2
907 WP.1850.22 n ca.odt
The petitioners have directly approached this Court seeking issuance
of a Writ of Mandamus. This Court would not issue a Writ of
Mandamus in a challenge to a recovery certificate issued under
Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act.
4.
This petition is, therefore, disposed off.
5.
The petitioners would be at liberty to avail of a statutory
remedy, as may be permissible in law.
6.
The pending civil application would not survive and stands
disposed off.
7.
The time spent by the petitioners in this Court from 22nd
November, 2021 till the passing of this order, would be a ground for
seeking condonation of delay.
[ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ]
[ RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ]
nga