BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
K.U.CHANDIWAL, J
Niranjansing s/o Bharatsing Dudhani – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction details and incident summary. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. evidence of participation and recovery. (Para 3 , 10) |
| 3. legal arguments and case law applications. (Para 5 , 6 , 11) |
| 4. final decision and reasoning. (Para 12) |
JUDGMENT:
1. The appellant questions conviction recorded in Sessions Case No.55/2009 for offense under Section 395 of IPC, directing to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/-; in default, rigorous imprisonment for three months, by order dated 15.9.2011 of the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Majalgaon, district Beed.
2. FACTS:
(a) In the night of 15.9.2009, PW No.1 Dilip Sable and Dnyanoba Sable were sleeping in the jewellery shop of his uncle, Omkar Jewellers with Babasaheb Arjun Muli, Arjun Laxman Jadhav, Santosh Balasaheb Solunke, Sandip Chaganrao Chalak. As per practice, said Dilip had carried gold ornaments of his shop Kedareshwar Jewellers to the shop of Omkar Jewellers to be safely stacked. At about 4 a.m., Santosh heard rattling noise of disturbance to shutter and, resultantly, they woke up. They were stunned to see five persons, muffled, barged in the shop by curving the shutter. They were armed with knife, ir
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.