Advocates:
['NAGARSOGE SAHEBRAO A', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'R NO AND ARE SERVED', 'AGP']

1016.22wp etc

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

902 WRIT PETITION NO.1016 OF 2022

GANESH DNYANDEO SABLE

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WITH

904 WRIT PETITION NO.1247 OF 2022

MAHADEV BHIMRAO RAUT

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

….

Mr S. A. Nagarsoge, Advocate for petitioners;

Mr S. B. Yawalkar, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 to 4

Mr P. D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent No.5 in

WP/1247/2022

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE

AND

ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ.

DATE : 20th July, 2022

PER COURT:

1.

In both these petitions, the petitioners are identically placed.

In the first petition, the petitioner has put forth prayer clause (B)

and (C), which read as under :-

“B)

By issuing writ of mandamus or any other

appropriate writ or order or direction in the like nature

it may be held that the petitioner is entitled to get the

benefit of old pension scheme i.e., Maharashtra Civil

Services (Pension) Rule 1982 and Maharashtra Civil

Services (Commutation of Pension) Rule 1984 and

1016.22wp etc

(2)

General Provident Fun