SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PURUSHOTTAM SITARAM KOLI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['BAYAS ANANDSING AND E S MURGE', 'COPY SERVED ON G P', '', 'BADE PATIL K D', 'G P', '', '', '', 'SALVE AVINASH R AND R R KULKARNI']

1 9630.13wp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO.9630 OF 2013

Purushottam Sitaram Koli,

Age: 45 years, Occ: Service,

R/o. Plot No. 6, Vivekanand Nagar,

Jalgaon, Dist. Jalgaon. ...PETITIONER

VERSUS

1.

The State of Maharashtra,

Through its Secretary

Tribal Development

Mantralaya, Mumbai.

2.

The Scheduled Tribe Certificate

Scrutiny Committee, Nandurbar

Region, Nandurbar,

District Nandurbar.

3.

The Additional Director,

General Administration Department,

Extended Astrila Batteries,

Building No.1, Ground Floor,

Dharavi Road, Matunga,

Mumbai 400 019.

4.

The Superintendent Engineer,

Maharashtra State Electricity

Distribution Company Limited,

Vidyut Bhawan, Old MIDC Area,

Ajanta Road, Jalgaon.

5.

The Collector,

Jalgaon.

2 9630.13wp

6.

The Tahsildar,

Jalgaon. ...RESPONDENTS

...

Mr. Anandsing S. Bayas, Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. D.B. Bhange, A.G.P. for respondent/State.

Mr. K.D. Bade Patil, Advocate f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top