HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
KAILAS BALASAHEB NISTANE AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
RAJENDRA RATILAL MUNOT AND OTHERS – Respondent
SA 32/2015
SA 32/15
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
SECOND APPEAL NO.32/2015
1]
Shri Kailas Balasaheb Nistane,
age 51 yrs., occu.business,
r/o Church Road, Ahmadnagar.
2]
Sau.Anita Kailas Nistane,
since deceased hence through L.Rs.:
2A]
Shri Kailas Balasaheb Nistane,
age 51 yrs., occu.business,
r/o Church Road, Ahmadnagar.
2B]
Sau.Suwarna Yashwant Namde,
age 29 yrs., occu.household,
r/o Namde Chawal, Mohan Nagar,
Chinchwad, Pune.
2C]
Sau.Rani Ganesh Chanwandke,
age 27 yrs., occu.household,
r/o Bhimnagar, Gandhinagar,
Kopargaon Tq.Kopargaon
Dist.Ahmadnagar.
2D]
Miss.Pallavi Kailas Nistane,
age 24 yrs., occu.education,
r/o Church Road, Ahmadnagar.
2E]
Vinod Kailas Nistane,
age 19 yrs., occu.education,
r/o Church Road, Ahmadnagar.
...Appellants..
(Org.defendant nos.1 & 2)
Versus
1]
Shri Rajendra Ratilal Munot,
age 59 yrs., occu.trader,
r/o Vijaya Residency,
Chitale Road, Ahmadnagar.
SA 32/15
- 2 -
2]
Shri Sadashiv Vitthal Bondge,
age 63 yrs., occu.business,
3]
Shri Tukaram Karale,
age 49 yrs., occu.service,
4]
Shri Ganpat Ramchandra Raut,
age 48 yrs., occu.business,
5]
Shri Kishore Somnath Pawar,
age 48 yrs., occu.business,
6]
Shri Shankar Piraji Pawar,
age 45 yrs., occu.business,
7]
Shri Kishore Kisanrao Sarolkar,
age 50 yrs., occu.business,
Nos.2 to 7 all r/o House No.3452,
Church Road, Ahmadnagar.
8]
Ahmadnagar Shahar Sahakari Bank
Maryadit, Navi Peth, Ahmadnagar.
...Respondents...
(No.1 org.plaintiff.
Nos.2 to 8 org.defendant
nos.3 to 9)
.....
Shri Mukul S. Kulkarni, Advocate for appellants.
Shri Anil S. Bajaj, Advocate for respondent no.1.
.....
CORAM: N.W. SAMBRE, J.
JUDGMENT RESERVED ON 23.06.2015
JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON 14.7.2015
JUDGMENT :
1]
The present second appeal is by original
defendant Nos.1 & 2, who suffered a decree for specific
SA 32/15
- 3 -
performance by judgment and order dated 22.7.2009 passed
by 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar,
based on agreement of sale dated 15.12.2005 (Exhibit 57).
An appeal preferred by the present appellants before the
learned Ad Hoc District Judge-3, Ahmednagar, came to be
dismissed affirming the judgment and order dated
22.7.2009 by an order dated 19.9.2014. As such, present
second appeal by the original defendant Nos.1 & 2.
2]
The facts as are necessary for deciding the
present appeal are as under :-
[A]
The respondent no.1 herein filed a suit for
specific performance against the defendants
praying therein execution of saledeed in his
favour in respect of City Survey No.2659A/2 area
357. Sq.Mtrs. and City Survey No.2659B area 69.6
Sq.Mtrs. bearing House No.3452 situated at Khist
Galli in Ahmednagar. The above referred suit
property consists of eight rooms on the ground
floor and two rooms on the first floor alongwith
toilet blocks.
[B]
The appellants herein were the owners of
the suit property and were in joint possession of
SA 32/15
- 4 -
the same. So as to satisfy their debt, the
appellants herein have decided to sell the suit
property
for
a
total
consideration
of
Rs.6,50,000/- to the respondent no.1 – plaintiff
and as such executed an agreement of sale on
December 15, 2005, on which date, the respondent
no.1 paid an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- by way of
earnest money to the appellants herein. One of
the conditions in the agreement was, an amount of
Rs.1,07,759/- will be paid to the defendant no.9 –
bank to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.