HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI
NARAYAN SANTRAM SATHE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
BA/1601/2021
BAIL - NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT, 1985 - SECTION 20(A), 20(B) - [18 KILOGRAMS OF GANJA PLANTS SEIZED] - Applicant granted bail considering the quantity of ganja seized was non-commercial and the absence of a test to confirm the nature of the plants at the time of seizure.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant was arrested for cultivating and possessing 18 kilograms of ganja plants, which were seized during a police raid. The applicant was not present at the time of the raid but arrived later and refused a personal search.
Finding of the Court:
The court noted that the definition of ganja under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act includes cannabis plants, and that the quantity seized was non-commercial. The court also noted that there was no evidence of a test being conducted at the time of seizure to confirm the nature of the plants.
Issues: Whether the applicant should be granted bail considering the quantity of ganja seized and the absence of a test to confirm the nature of the plants at the time of seizure.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on previous decisions of the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court, which held that bail can be granted in cases involving non-commercial quantities of ganja, even if the plants have not yet produced fruiting tops.
Final Decision: The court granted the applicant bail on a personal bond of Rs. 30,000/- with one solvent surety of Rs. 30,000/-.
ORDER :
1. Present Application has been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the accused who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 349 of 2021 registered with Ausa Police Station, District-Latur for the offences punishable under Section 20 (A), 20 (b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
2. Heard Mr. Salunke, learned Advocate for the applicant and Mrs Patil – Jadhav, learned APP for the respondent – State. Learned Advocate for the applicant has relied on the decision of this Court in Jagan Parasram Chavan vs. The State of Maharashtra, 2014 ALL MR (Cri) 4589, wherein recovery of Ganja was 14 Kilogram allegedly cultivated by the applicant therein, yet he was given bail by this Court. Further, reliance has been placed on the decision in Birbal Prasad @ Birbal Prasad Sah @ Birbal Prasad Sao @ Birbal Sah vs. The State of Bihar, 2018 ALL MR (Cri) 2293 (S.C.), wherein also when the quantity involved in the case was 14 Kilogram of Ganja, which was non-commercial quantity, bail was given by the Apex Court.
3. Perusal of the First Information Report lodged by Police Inspector Shankar Patwari of Ausa Police Station on 3rd November 2021 discloses that his team had received secret information about cultivation of Ganja and accordingly after complying with the provisions, raid was conducted. When they had found that there was crop of Ganja, at that time the applicant was not present. They could find in all fifteen plants of Ganja, one axe and one wooden plank. They uprooted the plants and brought it in the open place. At that time present applicant arrived at the place. He was offered personal search, which he refused and then the seized articles were weighed. It was found that the weight of the plants was 18 Kilogram and therefore, offence has been registered against the present applicant.
4. It is to be noted that though the learned Advocate for the applicant tried to make differentiation between the definition of Ganja and the fact that in the present case what has been seized is the plants thereby no fruiting tops were seized, yet it can be seen that the cannabis plants have been covered under the definition of Section 2 (iv) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.
5. Now, the question is, when 18 Kilogram of Ganja i.e. cannabis plants have been recovered, whether the applicant deserves to be released on bail. Here at this stage, the C.A. Report is not collected nor the First Information Report states that any test was done with any quick testing instrument at the spot to show prima facie that the plants those were seized are cannabis plants. Therefore, in view of the decisions referred and relied on by the learned Advocate for the applicant, the applicant deserves to be released on bail. Hence the following order:-
O R D E R
i) The Application stands allowed.
ii) The applicant – Narayan S/o Santram Sathe be released on bail in connection with Crime No. 349 of 2021 registered with Ausa Police Station, District-Latur for the offences punishable under Section 20 (A), 20 (b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 on PR Bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) with one solvent surety of Rs.30,000/-
(Rupees Thirty Thousand).
iii) The applicant shall comply with the requirements set out in Para No. 12 (1) to (6) of Chapter-I of the Criminal Manual, whichever are applicable.
iv) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity nor shall tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner.
v) The applicant shall remain present before the Investigating Officer on every Monday between 10.00 a.m. to 2.00 p.m. till filing of the charge-sheet.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.