Back
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J
Baswaraj S/o Vishwanath Agre – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court orders anticipatory bail due to lack of urgency from prosecution. (Para 1 , 6) |
| 2. possession of banned products requires intent for charges under section 328. (Para 3) |
| 3. prosecution lacks evidence that custodial interrogation is necessary. (Para 4 , 5) |
ORDER :
1. Applicant is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.154 of 2021 registered with Aurad Shahajani Police Station, Taluka-Nilanga, District-Latur for the offence punishable under Sections 328 , 188, 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 26 (2) (i) (ii) (iv), 30 (2) (a) and Section 59 of the Food Safety and Standards Act .
2. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Vikrant Valse holding for learned Advocate Mr. T.M. Venjane for the applicant and learned APP Mr. B.V. Virdhe for the respondent – State.
3. It has been vehemently submitted on behalf of the applicant that perusal of the First Information Report that has been lodged by Food Safety Officer, Latur would show that on receiving information, Assistant Police Inspector, Aurad Shahajani Police Station, visited the spot and seized certain packets of Vimal Pan Masala, V-1 Tobacco etc. from the possession of the applicant. The total worth of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
