HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
YATINDRA KANTILAL JAIN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER – Respondent
APPLN 3240/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
BAIL APPLICATION NO.1612 OF 2021
MUDASSAR ABDUL @ HAJI KARIM QURESHI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
…..
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. S. S. Jadhav
APP for Respondent-State : Mr. N. T. Bhagat
…..
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3241 OF 2021
IN BA/1612/2021
YATINDRA KANTILAL JAIN
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
…..
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. A. N. Nagargoje
APP for Respondent No.1-State : Mr. N. T. Bhagat
Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. S. S. Jadhav
…..
WITH
BAIL APPLICATION NO.1615 OF 2021
SHAKIR @ MONYA MOHAMMAD SHAIKH
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
…..
Senior Counsel for Applicant : Mr. V. D. Hon i/b Mr. A. V. Hon
APP for Respondent-State : Mr. N. T. Bhagat
…..
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3240 OF 2021
IN BA/1615/2021
2 BA1612-2021, 1615-2021, CA 3240-2021, CA 3241-2021
YATINDRA KANTILAL JAIN
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
…..
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. A. N. Nagargoje
APP for Respondent No.1-State : Mr. N. T. Bhagat
Senior Counsel for Respondent No.2 : Mr.V.D. Hon i/b Mr. A. V. Hon
…..
CORAM : SMT.VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.
Date of Reserving the Order
:
21-12-2021
Date of Pronouncing the Order
:
11-01-2022
ORDER :
1.
Criminal Applications No.3240 of 2021 and No.3241 of 2021
have been filed for assist to learned APP. Said applications are
allowed and disposed of.
2.
Applicants have been arrested in connection with Crime
No.518 of 2021, registered at Sangamner City Police Station, District
Ahmednagar, for the offence punishable under Section 269, 429
read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 5A, 5C, 9A, 9 of the
Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act, 1976 Amended in 1995 and
Section 3 and 11 of the Preservation of Cruelty to the Animal Act,
1960. They have filed present applications under Section 439 of the
3 BA1612-2021, 1615-2021, CA 3240-2021, CA 3241-2021
Code of Criminal Procedure.
3.
Heard learned Senior Counsel Mr. V. D. Hon instructed by Mr.
A. V. Hon, learned Advocate Mr. S. S. Jadhav for applicants, leanred
APP Mr. N. T. Bhagat for respondent-State and learned Advocate Mr.
A. N. Nagargoje for assist to learned APP.
4.
It has been vehemently submitted by learned Senior Counsel
Mr. V. D. Hon instructed by Mr. A. V. Hon for the applicant in Bail
Application No.1615 of 2021 that the investigation is over and
charge-sheet has been filed on 03-10-2021 and, therefore, the
custody of the applicant is not required. As regards this applicant is
concerned, admittedly he was not present at the spot when the
informant who is police officer visited the spot. His name appears
on Serial No.10 and as per the allegations in the charge-sheet, he
had helped the accused No.1 to 9 to arrange the vehicle carrying
cow meat in such a way that the water should not come out of the
body of the vehicle. In fact, it does not amount to any kind of
offence. Even if that allegation is taken as it is, it can be said that it
has been made to order as required or contracted with the accused
No.1 to 9. That per se does not presume that the applicant had any
kind of mens rea to commit any such offence under which the
4 BA1612-2021, 1615-2021, CA 3240-2021, CA 3241-2021
offence has been registered. Therefore, the applicant deserves to be
released on bail.
5.
Learned Advocate Mr. S. S. Jadhav appearing for the applicant
in Bail Application No.1612 of 2021 submitted that the applicant has
been shown as accused No.2 in the FIR. It has been contended that
when the informant raided the slaughterhouse with his party at
09.30 p.m. on 02-10-2021, at that time the present applicant and
accused No.1 Wahid Qureshi fled away from the spot and,
thereafter, they found one Abidur Haq Abdul Jabbar/accused No.