Advocates:
['BARDE PARAG VIJAY', 'SHRI N L JADHAV', '', 'CVTR', 'PROCEEDING NUMBER DIFFER']

SA-135-2016.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

SECOND APPEAL NO. 135 OF 2016

Narsingrao Kisanrao Murme

… Appellant

(Orig. Defendant)

Versus

Mahananda Sudhakar @ Sudam Ingle

… Respondent

(Orig. Plaintiff)

.…

Mr. P. V. Barde, Advocate for appellant

Mr. N. L. Jadhav, Advocate for respondent

.…

CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT, J.

DATED : 8^th SEPTEMBER, 2022

PER COURT :-

.

Heard.

2.

This is original defendant'

s Second Appeal. The

respondent is the real sister of the appellant herein. Their father died

on 27.05.2009. The mother predecess the father. The respondent

filed the suit for partition and separate possession of ancestral

property. The learned Advocate for the appellant would submit that

the suit property was the self acquisition of the father. The said had

been averred in so many words. The trial Court answered the issue

No.1 as regards nature of the suit property in not more than 3 - 4

1 of 3

(( 2 ))

SA-135-2016

lines. In view of this Court, in the facts and circumstances of the

case, answer to the question whether the property was ancestral on

self acquired property of the father, would make little difference.

3.

The appellant had come w