SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
RUKMINBAI RAOSAHEB SALUNKE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['MALI D S', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'PATIL HANMANT V', 'URGUNDE SUHAS P', 'AGP']

wp13636-19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 13636 OF 2019

Sow. Rukminbai Raosaheb Salunke,

Age Major, Occu: Household,

R/o Raghvendra Colony, Near Siddhi

Vinayak Mandir, Old Ausa Road,

Latur, Tq. & Dist. Latur

... Petitioner

VERSUS

1.

The State of Maharashtra,

Through the Secretary

Department of Urban Development,

Mantralaya, Mumbai

2.

The Assistant Director of Town Planning,

Municipal Corporation Latur,

District Latur.

3.

The Latur Municipal Corporation, Latur

Through its Commissioner

... Respondents

Mr. D.S. Mali, Advocate for the petitioner,

Mrs. V. N. Patil-Jadhav, AGP for respondent No. 1-State

Mr. H. V. Patil, Advocate for respondent No. 3-Corporation

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL &

Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE

: 29.11.2022

JUDGMENT ( Per Y. G. Khobragade, J.):

1.

We have heard learned counsel for both sides.

2.

Rule, made returnable forthwith. With the consent of both the

sides, the matter is heard finally at the stage of admission.

3.

By the present petition under Article 226 and 227 of the

Constitution of India, th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top