HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
RUKMINBAI RAOSAHEB SALUNKE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS – Respondent
WP 13636/2019
['MALI D S', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'PATIL HANMANT V', 'URGUNDE SUHAS P', 'AGP']
wp13636-19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 13636 OF 2019
Sow. Rukminbai Raosaheb Salunke,
Age Major, Occu: Household,
R/o Raghvendra Colony, Near Siddhi
Vinayak Mandir, Old Ausa Road,
Latur, Tq. & Dist. Latur
... Petitioner
VERSUS
1.
The State of Maharashtra,
Through the Secretary
Department of Urban Development,
Mantralaya, Mumbai
2.
The Assistant Director of Town Planning,
Municipal Corporation Latur,
District Latur.
3.
The Latur Municipal Corporation, Latur
Through its Commissioner
... Respondents
Mr. D.S. Mali, Advocate for the petitioner,
Mrs. V. N. Patil-Jadhav, AGP for respondent No. 1-State
Mr. H. V. Patil, Advocate for respondent No. 3-Corporation
CORAM
: MANGESH S. PATIL &
Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
DATE
: 29.11.2022
JUDGMENT ( Per Y. G. Khobragade, J.):
1.
We have heard learned counsel for both sides.
2.
Rule, made returnable forthwith. With the consent of both the
sides, the matter is heard finally at the stage of admission.
3.
By the present petition under Article 226 and 227 of the
Constitution of India, the petitioner, who is owner of land which is
reserved in the final development plan of Latur Municipal Corporation, has
Page 1 of 6
wp13636-19
prays for declaration regarding lapsing of reservation in view of section
127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966
( hereinafter, '
the MRTP Act'
)
4.
Facts in brief are that the petitioner is owner of land bearing
survey Nos. 92, 89 and 86 situated at village Khadgaon Tq. and Dist.
Latur, within the limits of Latur Municipal Corporation, Latur. The said
lands are ancestral properties of the petitioner having mutation entry No.
10945 in the name of the petitioner in the revenue record. The
development plan of the Corporation for Latur City was published on
02.01.2002. Under the development plan, out of Survey No.92, the land
to the extent of 2 Hectare 25 Are is reserved for housing for dis-housed,
out of Survey No. 89, land to the extent of 60 R is reserved for primary
school & playground and 85 Are for playground and out of land survey
No. 86, land to the extent of 1 Hectare 65 Are is reserved for playground
and 65 Are for primary school & Playground as site Nos. 207, 208, 209,
213 and 214 respectively. Though lands of the petitioner were reserved
under the development plan published on 02.01.2002 which came into
force with effect from 18.02.2002, but no steps have been initiated by the
planning authority for acquisition of the said property for more than 10
years, therefore, the petitioner issued a notice dated 09.10.2017 under
section 127 of the MRTP Act approximately after 16 years but in spite of
service of notice, no effective steps have been taken by the Municipal
Corporation for acquisition of the said land within a period of 24 months
of service of the notice. However, the respondent No. 3-Corporation vide
notice dated 18.12.2017 communicated the petitioner that certified copy
of the draft development plan, measurement map are not submitted
alongwith the notice and that it will take appropriate steps on receipt of
the same. The petitioner replied the said notice on 20.12.2017,
contending that certified copy of the draft development plan, measurement
map are already in the office of respondent No.3, however, the respondent
Page 2 of 6
wp13636-19
No.3 again insisted for the same and failed to take any step for acquisition.
Therefore, the petitioner prays for de-reservation of land under Section
127 of the MRTP Act. Hence this petition.
5.
Mr. D.S. Mali, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
revised draft development plan of Latur City was prepared by