PRIYANKA PRATEEK PATIL – Appellant
Versus
PRATEEK SUBHASH PATIL – Respondent
{1}
mca1019.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10 OF 2019
Priyanka Prateek Patil
Applicant
Versus
Prateek Subhash Patil
Respondents
Mr.Yogesh H. Jadhav, advocate holding for Mr.Girish A. Nagori,
advocate for the Applicant
Ms.Gauri Joglekar with Mr.Shrikant Bhilare and Mr.Amit A.
Yadkikar, advocates for the Respondent.
CORAM : V.K.JADHAV, J.
DATE : 23rd February, 2021.
PC :
1
By consent of learned Counsel for respective parties,
heard fnally at the stage of admission
2
This is about transfer of matrimonial proceedings from
Thane to Jalgaon.
3
The applicant-wife resides with her parents at Jalgaon.
Respondent-husband has fled HMP No.137 of 2018 for nullity of
marriage and the same is pending on the fle of Family Court at
Thane.
{2}
mca1019.odt
4
The learned Counsel for the applicant-wife submits
that distance between Thane and Jalgaon is nearabout 560 Kms.
It is not convenient for the appl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.