SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PRIYANKA PRATEEK PATIL – Appellant
Versus
PRATEEK SUBHASH PATIL – Respondent


{1}

mca1019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10 OF 2019

Priyanka Prateek Patil

Applicant

Versus

Prateek Subhash Patil

Respondents

Mr.Yogesh H. Jadhav, advocate holding for Mr.Girish A. Nagori,

advocate for the Applicant

Ms.Gauri Joglekar with Mr.Shrikant Bhilare and Mr.Amit A.

Yadkikar, advocates for the Respondent.

CORAM : V.K.JADHAV, J.

DATE : 23rd February, 2021.

PC :

1

By consent of learned Counsel for respective parties,

heard fnally at the stage of admission

2

This is about transfer of matrimonial proceedings from

Thane to Jalgaon.

3

The applicant-wife resides with her parents at Jalgaon.

Respondent-husband has fled HMP No.137 of 2018 for nullity of

marriage and the same is pending on the fle of Family Court at

Thane.

{2}

mca1019.odt

4

The learned Counsel for the applicant-wife submits

that distance between Thane and Jalgaon is nearabout 560 Kms.

It is not convenient for the appl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top