SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DIGAMBAR RAMCHANDRA BAWASKAR – Appellant
Versus
SOMA PRABHU PAWAR AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['M M BHOKARIKAR', 'CAVEAT FILED BY ADV VIJAY B PATIL', '', '', 'PATIL VIJAY B']

WP/1539/2016

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 1539 OF 2016

Digambar Ramchandra Bawaskar

Age 50 years, Occ. Agriculture,

R/o Kerhale Bk., Tq. Raver,

District Jalgaon.

..Petitioner

Versus

1. Soma Prabhu Pawar

Age 55 yeas, Occ. Agriculture

2. Smt.Reshmbai Kamalsingh Chavan

Age 68 years, Occ. Agriculture,

Both r/o Jinasi, Tq. Raver,

District Jalgaon.

3. Shri Maheshchandra Namdeo

Lokhande, Age 45 years,

Occupation Agriculture,

R/o Wani Galli, Raver,

District Jalgaon.

..Respondents

...

Advocate for Petitioners : Shri M.M.Bhokarikar

Advocate for Respondents 1 to 3 : Shri Vijay B. Patil

...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

Dated: July 19, 2017

...

ORAL JUDGMENT :-

1.

Heard learned Advocates for the respective parties.

2.

Rule.

WP/1539/2016

2

3.

By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith and the

petition is taken up for final disposal.

4.

The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 5.12.2015,

by which, his application Exhibit 17 seeking leave to withdraw

the affidavit filed in lieu of examination-in-chief or discard the

said affidavit, was rejected.

5.

I have considered the strenuous submissions of the

learned Advocates

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top