SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PRALHAD RUPCHAND TALELE AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['PATIL VIJAY B', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'DHONGADE SURESH D', 'GP', 'S D DHONGADE', 'DHONGADE SURESH D']

1 wp 13937.18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 13937 OF 2018

PRALHAD RUPCHAND TALELE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

...

Advocate for Petitioners :

Mr. Patil Vijay B.

AGP for Respondents No. 1 to 5 :

Mr. K. B. Jadhavar

Advocate for Respondents No. 6 to 8 :

Mr. S. D. Dhongade

...

CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA &

MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE:

25

th JUNE, 2019

PER COURT:

1.

The petitioners seek direction against the

respondents to acquire their land. The acquiring

body has filed an affidavit. Paragraph No. 21 of

the affidavit reads thus -

“As to contents of paragraph No. 20 the

deponent submits that, Varangaon Talvel

Pariser Sinchan Yogana is the Lift Irrigation

Scheme and a major project. Out of its main

components PH2 is planned in gut No. 83/2 of

Muje Manpur Tal. Bhusaval Dist. Jalgaon. In

due construction process and as their was not

clear demarcation between Gut No. 83/1 and

Gut No. 83/2 some part of construction of PH2

2 wp 13937.18

is existing in Gut No. 83/2 also. Respondent

No. 8 already acc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top