HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
NEHA SURYAKANT BHOSALE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent
WP 15280/2017
['WAKADE RAMESH I', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'KAKDE SUNIL B', 'GP', 'S B KAKADE', 'KALE MAHESH P AND K G SALUNKE', 'SAKOLKAR VIJAY G', 'R/ SERVED FINAL DISPOSAL', 'R', 'amp; SERVED']
1
wp15280.17 Judgment.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 15280 OF 2017
Neha D/o Suryakant Bhosale,
Age; 31 years, Occ; Service,
R/o; JBPC Bank Colony,
in front of Bethel Church,
Ramnagar,Jalna.
...PETITIONER
V E R S U S
1.
The State of Maharashtra,
Through its Secretary,
Department of School Education,
Mantralaya-32.
2.
The Deputy Director of Education,
Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad.
3.
The Education Officer (Primary),
Zilla Parishad, Jalna.
4.
John Wilson Education Society,
Mumbai.
Through its Secretary
Wilson College, Girgaum Chaupati
Mumbai 400 007.
5.
Dr.Fraser Boy’s Primary School,
Jalna - 431203, Tq. & Dist. Jalna
Through it’s Head Mistress.
6.
C. T.M.K. Gujrathi Primary School,
Jalna Tq. & Dist. Jalna,
Through its Head Master.
...RESPONDENTS
2
wp15280.17 Judgment.docx
..………………………………….
Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.Ramesh I. Wakade
AGP for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 : Mrs. Vaishali N. Patil (Jadhav)
Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Mr.K.G. Salunke
Advocate for Respondent No. 5 : Mr.S.S. Chillarge h/f Mr. V.G. Sakolkar
Advocate for Respondent No. 6 : Mr. Pradeep Salunke h/f Mr. Sunil B.
Kakade
………………………………...
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL &
SANDEEP V. MARNE, JJ.
RESERVED DATE : 04.10.2022
PRONOUNCEMENT DATE : 14.10.2022
JUDGMENT : [PER : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]
1.
Rule. Made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the
learned Advocates for the respective parties, heard finally at the stage
of admission.
2.
Having been rendered surplus on 29.06.2013, Petitioner is
aggrieved by her non absorption. She has sought following prayers in
the petition :
“B. By issuing appropriate writ of mandamus or any
other appropriate writ, order of direction in like nature,
respondents may kindly be directed to absorb the
petitioner being surplus teacher on the place of retired
employee Smt. S.S.Ghorpade (Assistant Teacher) in the
School of respondent No. 5 to release the regular salary
to petitioner as per law and such exercise of
absorption, may pleased be done within a period of 4
weeks.
C.
By issuing appropriate writ of mandamus or any
3
wp15280.17 Judgment.docx
other appropriate writ, order or direction in like nature,
respondents may kindly be directed to make a
payment of salary of petitioner since September, 2015
till this date in accordance with law as expeditiously as
possible.
D.
By issuing appropriate writ or mandamus or any
other appropriate writ, order or direction in like nature,
respondent No. 3-Education Officer, Z.P. Jalna may
kindly be directed to take strict action against
respondent No. 5 & 6 with regards to non absorption of
petitioner and submit the compliance report in the
present matter accordingly.”
3.
The petitioner was appointed on 26.11.2007 in Dr. Fraser
Boy’s Primary School, Jalna, (respondent No. 5-School) which is
managed by respondent No. 4 Society. An approval to her appointment
was granted vide order dated 17.01.2008 w.e.f. 26.11.2007. By
communication dated 29.06.2013, she along with three other Assistant
Teachers were informed that they were rendered surplus in accordance
with the staffing pattern for the year 2013-14. They were further
directed to report the duties in the Respondent No. 5-School.
4.
By the order dated 27.01.2014, the Education Officer
(Primary) Zilla Parishad, Jalna ordered absorption of the petitioner in
C.T.M.K. Gujrati Primary School, Jalna (respondent No. 6-school).
Accordingly, respondent No. 5-School relieved her w.e.f. 01.02.2014.
However, respondent No. 6-school did not permit her to join duties,
which fact was brought to the notice of the Education Officer by her
4
wp15280.17 Judgment.docx
vide letter dated 01.02.2014. Therefore, the Education Officer wrote to
respondent No. 5-School to submit h