SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KESHAO PAIKUJI THEDKAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAH.THR.PSO WARDHA – Respondent


Advocates:
['GG MODAK', 'RN KHARE', 'RD DHAR', '', 'MADHIKARI', 'RS SUBHEDAR', 'SP KULKARNI APPOINTED', 'APP']

apeal654.04.odt 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.654 OF 2004

Keshao s/o. Paikuji Thedkar,

Aged about 35 yrs.,

r/o. Bori (Bara), Tah. Arvi,

Distt. Wardha.

........

APPELLANT

// VERSUS //

The State of Maharashtra,

Through P.S.O., Pulgaon,

Distt. Wardha.

.........

RESPONDENT.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Mrs.S.P.Kulkarni, Adv. (appointed) for the Appellant.

Ms R.A.Deshpande, A.P.P. for the Respondent/State.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

CORAM : A.P. BHANGALE, J.

DATE : 13.07.2012.

ORAL JUDGMENT :

1.

By this appeal, the appellant/accused is challenging the

judgment and order dated 24th September, 2004 passed by 1st Ad-hoc

apeal654.04.odt 2

Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in Sessions Trial No.35 of 2002

whereby the appellant was convicted of the offence punishable under

Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous

imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine in the sum of Rs.500/-, in

default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a further p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top