SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
STRONGBUILD CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD., THR. DIRECTORS, MUMBAI AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
B.R. AGRAWAL TIMBERS AND SUPPLIERS THR. PROP. MANJU BRAJRATAN AGRAWAL, NAGPUR THR. B.J. AGRAWAL – Respondent
CRA 7/2022



Advocates:
['CHETAN RAJENDRA SHARMA', 'DARASING J SINDHU', '', 'R S THAKRE']

48.CRA.07.22.odt

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION

NO.

07

OF 20

22

(Strongbuilt Construction Pvt. Ltd. & ors. Vs. Shri B.R. Agrawal Timbers and Suppliers, Nagpur)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of

Court's or Judge's Order

Coram, appearances, Court's Orders

or directions and Registrar's order

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Shri C.R. Sharma, Advocate for the applicants.

Shri Dara Singh Sindhu, Advocate for the non-applicant.

CORAM : M.S. KARNIK, J.

DATED : APRIL

20

, 2022

.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

I have perused the impugned order dated

04/01/2022 in S.C.C. No.190/2021 passed by the Civil

Judge, Senior Division, Nagpur.

3.

My attention is invited by learned counsel for

the applicants to a decision of recent origin of the

Supreme Court in the case of B.L. Kashyap and Sons Ltd.

Vs. M/s. JMS Steels and Power Corporation and another

arising out of SLP (C) No.19413 of 2018 on the question

of grant of leave to defend.

4.

Learned counsel for the parties jointly request

that the impugned order be set aside by consent.

Considering the totality of the circumstances, without

making any observations, the impugned order is set aside

by consent.

5.

The trial Court to hear the application below

Exh. 15 afresh on its own merits and in accordance with

law without being influenced by the observations made

48.CRA.07.22.odt

2

in the order dated 04/01/2022. I may not be

understood to have made any observations on merits of

the contention. All contentions in that respect are kept

open.

6.

The civil revision application is disposed of

accordingly.

(M.S. KARNIK, J.

)

*DB

Signed By:DIVYA SONU BALDWA

Signing Date:21.04.2022 10:34

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top