SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT NAGPUR
C JAGESHWAR RAO @ C SHRIRAM NAIDU – Appellant
Versus
SMT. C PADMAVATI NAIDU and 4 ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['AG GHAROTE', 'AA SAMBARAY', 'AM', 'SM GHARE', 'LH KOTHARI', '', 'G P']

1

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

Appeal against Order No. 22/2008

(C.Jageshwar Rao @ C.Shriram Naidu Suryanarayanrao Naidu VERSUS C. Padmavati

Naidu & others)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,

Court's or Judge's orders

appearances, Court's orders of directions

and Registrar's orders

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Shri A.G. Gharote, counsel for the appellant.

Shri A.M. Ghare, counsel for the R-1 to 4.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J.

DATE : JANUARY 23, 2009.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

By

the

instant

appeal,

the

appellant

challenges the order passed by the Joint Civil Judge

(Senior Division), Nagpur on 13.02.2008 rejecting an

application filed by the appellant under Order XXXIII

Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top