HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
VINOD DNYANESHWARRAO KHARBADE – Appellant
Versus
KU. VAISHALI RAJU PATIL, (NEE) SAU. VAISHALI NITIN BURANGE – Respondent
APPA 294/2022
['PARAG ANIL KADU', '', 'SHAHU NANDKISHOR CHIKHALE', 'PRAVIN SHESHRAO PATIL']
23 APPA-294-2022.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO.294 OF 2022
(Vinod Dnyaneshwarrao Kharbade .Vs. Vaishali Raju Patil (Nee Sau.
Vaishali Nitin Burange))
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order
and Registrar's orders.
Shri P. A. Kadu, Advocate for Applicant.
Shri K. Rao h/f Shri P. S. Patil, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : AVINASH G.
GHAROTE, J.
D ATE
: 28
th JUNE
, 202
2 .
.
Heard Shri Kadu, learned Counsel for Applicant
and Shri Rao h/f Shri Patil, learned Counsel for the
Respondent.
2.
The contention is that in spite of the admission
regarding issuance of the cheque by the accused, though
a plea was raised in defence, that it was on account of
security, and therefore, the presumption under Section
138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, was
attracted, the complaint has been dismissed on the
ground, that the complainant was unable to
demonstrate the availability of sufficient fund so as to
lend the money (Para 29 Page 45). It is submitted
relying upon Kalamani Tex and Another ..Vrs.. P.
Balasubramanian, 2021 (5) SCC 283, (Para 14), that
once the signature on the cheque is admitted, the
presumption stands attracted, and therefore, the burden
shifted upon the accused as a result of which, unless it
was discharged the onus would not shift back upon the
23 APPA-294-2022.odt
complainant, considering which, case for grant of leave
is made out. Accordingly, leave is granted.
3.
Office to register the Appeal.
4.
Issue notice for final disposal at the stage of
admission.
5.
Shri K. Rao, learned Advocate for the Respondent
waives notice on merits.
6.
Shri P. Kadu, learned Advocate for Applicant to
place on record the complaint, the evidence and all
exhibited documents with an advance copy to the
Respondent as the only issue involved is, whether it was
permissible in the aforesaid circumstances for the
learned Magistrate to shift the burden.
7.
List the matter on 13.07.2022 at the end of the
admission board.
JUDGE
TAMBE.
Digitally signed byASHISH
ASHOKRAO TAMBE
Signing Date:28.06.2022
17:14