Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
V. M. DESHPANDE, J
Igabai alias Indubai Waman Nimbalkar, Ramdas s/o Waman Nimbalkar, Sou. Asha Yashwantrao Thakre, Sou. Sunanda Balkrushna Kale – Appellant
Versus
Balasaheb Balaji Bairagi Mandir Sansthan Kholapur, The State of Maharashtra, Sub Divisional Officer, Tiwasa – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. approval of writ petition marks the start of the hearing. (Para 2) |
| 2. differing arguments presented on the claim of tenancy. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court discusses lack of evidence supporting tenancy. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. court upheld the mrt's ruling on eviction. (Para 8) |
2. By this petition, the petitioners are challenging judgment and order passed by learned Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Nagpur (hereinafter referred to as “MRT”) in Tenancy Revision No.REV/TNC/AMR-81/2018, dated 04.03.2020, whereby learned Member, MRT dismissed the tenancy revision filed on behalf of the petitioners, upholding the order passed by Sub Divisional Officer, Bhatkuli dated 30.07.2018 in Tenancy Case No.59/(13)/Hartala/06/2014-2015.
3. According to the learned counsel for petitioners, respondent no.1 filed an application under Section 120 (3) of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 for eviction of the petitioners. He submits that said application was erroneously allowed by Sub Divisional Officer and it was affirmed erroneously by learned Member of the MRT. He submits that the petitioners, being tenant of respondent no.1-trust, they cannot be evicted by taking
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
