SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Rohit B. Deo, J
Shrikrushna s/o Asaramji Revaskar – Appellant
Versus
Pushpa w/o Shrikrushna Revaskar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: A.M. Tirukh
For the Respondents: R. Khemuka, h/f V.R. Deshpande

2. Rule.

3. With consent, the petitions are finally heard at the admission stage.

4. Common issues of fact and law are involved, and it would be convenient to dispose of both the petitions by common judgment.

5. Criminal Writ Petition 504/2020 is preferred by Mr. Shrikrushna, who is the husband of respondent Mrs. ‘P’, and his parents, challenging the judgment dated 26.11.2019 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Akola, in Criminal Appeal 38/2017 whereby the appeal preferred by Mrs. ‘P’ under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act) is partly allowed and the maintenance and rent granted by the learned Judicial Magistrate in Misc. Criminal Case 1724/2014 is enhanced from Rs.8000/- to Rs.15,000/- and Rs.2000/- to Rs.3000/-, respectively.

Criminal Writ Petition 424/2020 is preferred by Mr. Shrikrushna and his parents challenging the judgment dated 26.11.2019 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Akola in Criminal Appeal 119/2017 whereby the appeal preferred by them against the judgment dated 30.01.2017 rendered by the learned 6th Joint Judicial Magistrate First Class, Akola in Misc. Criminal Case 1724/2014 is dismissed.

6. Before

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top