SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
MANISH PITALE, J
Rajesh s/o Himmatlal Dawda – Appellant
Versus
Naresh s/o Gyarsilal Agrawal – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri M.R. Joharapurkar
For the Respondents: Shri N.G. Jetha

Table of Content
1. court's procedure and preliminary remarks. (Para 1 , 2)
2. challenge to interim fair rent fixation. (Para 3)
ORAL JUDGMENT :

1. Heard.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of the learned counsel for the rival parties.

3. By this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged order dated 24/02/2021, passed by the Court of Small Causes, Nagpur, on an application filed on behalf of the respondent (landlord) for fixation of interim fair/standard rent of the tenanted premises. The said application has been partly allowed and the petitioner (tenant) has been directed to pay interim fair/standard rent of the suit plot at Rs.15,000/- per month from the date of filing of the application.

4. The respondent filed an application under Section 8 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 (in short "Act of 1999") for fixation of fair/standard rent. During the pendency of the said application, the respondent filed the aforesaid application for fixation of interim fair/standard rent for the tenanted premises. The application stood partly allowed, as noted above.

5 The petitioner being aggrieved by the said order filed the present writ petition, wherein

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top