Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
ANIL S. KILOR, J
Sanjay Bahurao Wakde – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for discharge was filed under atrocities act. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments centered on the evidence and incident location. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. prosecution argued sufficient evidence exists. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court found prima facie case adequate for not admitting discharge. (Para 10 , 11) |
1. Heard Shri S.A. Mohta, learned counsel for the appellant, Shri S.A. Ashirgade, learned APP for the respondent No.1/State and Shri N.D.Anjankar, learned counsel for the respondent No.2.
2. ADMIT.
3. By way of the present appeal filed under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act , 1989, the appellant has raised question to the validity and legality of the order passed below Exh.-13, dated 02.08.2021 passed by the learned Sessions Judge-11, Special Court, Nagpur, under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, in Special (Atrocities) Case No.534 of 2020, rejecting the application Exh.-13 for discharge.
4. On the allegations that the appellant had abused the complainant on her caste, offence came to be registered against the appellant vide Crime No.471 of 2020, dated 22.07.2020 register
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
