1 mca 78.2022

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 78 OF 2022

IN

WRIT PETITION NO. 2444 OF 2019

Dr. Manish Y. Ladole and ors.

..vs..

Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth and ors.

WITH

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 79 OF 2022

IN

WRIT PETITION NO. 2806 OF 2019

Dr. Umakant s/o Tukaramji Dangore and anr.

..vs..

Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth and ors.

WITH

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 80 OF 2022

IN

WRIT PETITION NO. 2471 OF 2019

Dr. Prashant C. Pagar and ors.

..vs..

State of Maharashtra, thr. Its Secretary and ors.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,

Court's or Judge's orders

appearances, Court's orders of directions

and Registrar's orders

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Misc. Civil Application No. 78 of 2022

Shri Shantanu Khedkar, Advocate for the applicants.

Shri Abhay R. Sambre, Advocate for non-applicant no. 1

Shri B.G. Kulkarni, Advocate for non-applicant no.2.

Misc. Civil Application No. 79 of 2022

Shri Shantanu Khedkar, Advocate for the applicants.

Shri Abhay R. Sambre, Advocate for non-applicant no. 1

Shri Mohan M. Sudame, Advocate for non-applicants nos. 2 and 3.

Misc. Civil Application No.80 of 2022.

Shri Shantanu Khedkar, Advocate for the applicants.

Mrs. K.R. Deshpande, A.G.P. for non-applicant-State.

Shri Abhay R. Sambre, Advocate a/w Ms. P.S.Chaudhari, Advocate

for non-applicant no.3.

Shri B.G. Kulkarni, Advocate for non-applicant nos.4 and 5.

1 mca 78.2022

2

CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR AND VINAY JOSHI, JJ.

CLOSED FOR ORDER ON

:

15.07.2022.

ORDER PRONOUNCED ON

: 20.07.2022.

Heard finally by consent of all parties.

2.

All review applications arise out of the

common judgment and order dated 27.02.2020

passed by this Court in Writ Petition Nos. 2444/2019,

2471/2019 and 2806/2019. The applicants of Misc.

Civil Application No.78 of 2022 were respondent nos.

2, 3 and 5 in Writ Petition No.2444 of 2019, whilst

applicants of Misc. Civil Application No.79 of 2022

were respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in Writ Petition

No.2806 of 2019 and applicants of Misc. Civil

Application No. 80 of 2022 were respondent Nos. 4, 5

and 7 to 10 in Writ Petition No.2471 of 2019. These

applicants have raised a common challenge to the

judgment and order of this Court on same grounds.

Hence, for the sake of convenience these review

applications were heard and taken together for

disposal. The applicants seek for review of the

common judgment and order dated 27.02.2020 of this

Court by stating that an error apparent has been

occurred due to misrepresentation made by the

petitioners of the respective writ petitions.

3.

For the sake of convenience facts of Misc.

Civil Application No.78 of 2022 pertaining to Writ

1 mca 78.2022

3

Petition No.2444 of 2019 are considered. At the

inception, we deem it necessary to state some of the

facts of Writ Petition No.2444 of 2019 and the

challenge raised therein. The petitioner (Dr. Amrapali

and anr.) being aggrieved by the orders of promotion

issued by Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth,

Akola, thereby promoting Assistant Professors to the

post of Associate Professors have preferred the Writ

Petition for setting aside the promotion of some

candidates. Precisely, the challenge was on the ground

that the University has midway changed the

promotion criteria during the process. The Resolution

dated 07.01.2019 of the Executive Council changing

the promotion criteria has also been challenged. The

petition was filed agai