SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Amit Borkar, J
Jyotsna @ Darshana w/o. Purushottam Lade – Appellant
Versus
Hari s/o. Sankhya Ambade – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: R. A. Gupte
For the Respondents:

ORAL JUDGMENT

1 Heard.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

3. By the present petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 04.10.2016 passed in M.J.C. No.1/2015 by the learned Civil Judge Junior Division, Arjuni Morgaon.

4. The respondent No.1 had filed Regular Civil Suit No.22/2012 seeking a permanent injunction against the petitioners, and respondent No.2 contending that he is the owner of the suit property and also in possession of the suit property. The petitioners and respondent No.2 appeared in the said suit by engaging an Advocate on 05.09.2012. On 17.04.2013, the learned Civil Judge Junior Division passed an ex parte decree against the present petitioners restraining them from disturbing the possession of respondent No.1/original plaintiff.

5. According to the petitioners, they got knowledge of the decree in the month of September 2014. Therefore, on 15.09.2014, applied for certified copies. The petitioners filed an application to set aside the ex parte decree by way of M.J.C. No.1/2015. By the impugned order, the said application for condonation of delay in applying setting aside ex parte decree has been rejected.

6. The Trial Court, while rejecting the applicatio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top