SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
PRASHANT S/O ANANDRAO GAIKWAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAH., THR. P.S.O. JARIPATKA – Respondent
ABA 21/2020



Advocates:
['ASHWIN M WASNIK', 'APP', '', 'ASHWINI S TAYADE', 'FOR R']

aba21.202 5

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO.21/2020

Prashant s/o Anandrao Gaikwad

..vs..

The State of Mah., thr. PSO Jaripatka, Nagpur and anr

...................................................................................................................................................................

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,

appearances, Court orders or directions

Court's or Judge's Order

and Registrar's orders

...................................................................................................................................................................

Shri Ashwin Wasnik, Counsel for the Applicant.

Ms Ashwini Tayde, Counsel for NA No.2/Complainant.

Shri P.S.Tembhare, Addl.P.P. for NA No.1/State.

CORAM

: V.M.DESHPANDE, J.

DATED

: JANUARY 22

, 2020

.

1.

The applicant is apprehending his arrest in

connection with Crime No.1332/2019 registered with

Jaripatka Police Station, Nagpur for offence punishable

under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal

Code.

2.

Heard learned counsel Shri Ashwin Wasnik for

the applicant, learned counsel Ms Ashwini Tayde for non-

applicant No.2/complainant, and learned Additional Public

Prosecutor Shri P.S.Tembhare for non-applicant No.1/State.

3.

Complainant in this case is Smt.Smita

Tarachand Bagde, the non-applicant No.2. She is

represented by learned counsel Ms Ashwini Tayde.

4.

Complainant Smt.Smita Tarachand Bagde, is

personally present. She is identified by her counsel. She

.....2/-

aba21.202 5

2

states in her vernacular to the Court that she has received

Rs.3,50,000/- from the applicant which were given to the

applicant on a promise that he will provide a job to her.

5.

Since the complainant has received the amount,

in my view, relief can be granted in this matter. However,

trial will go on against the applicant and his future will be

taken care of in the trial.

6.

In this view of the matter, I pass following

order:

ORDER

(1) The criminal application is allowed.

(2) In the event of arrest of applicant-Prashant s/o Anandrao

Gaikwad, in connection with Crime No.1332/2019

registered with Jaripatka Police Station, Nagpur for offence

punishable under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the

Indian Penal Code, the applicant be released on bail on he

executing a P.R.Bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with one

solvent surety of the like amount.

(3) The applicant is directed to attend the police station

once in a week i.e. on every Saturday, till filing of

chargesheet.

(4) Investigating Officer is directed to complete investigation

and file appropriate report. If report under Section 173 is

filed against the applicant, the Court shall decide the matter

.....3/-

aba21.202 5

3

in accordance with law.

With this, the criminal application stands

disposed of accordingly.

JUDGE

!! BRW !!

...../-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top