1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

MCAST NO.888 OF 2011.

IN

WRIT PETITION NO.5692 OF 2010

PRAGATISHEEL BAHUUDESHIYA VIKAS SANSTHA KHAIRLANJI

VS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

______________________________________________________________________

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of

Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders

or directions and Registrar's orders.

Shri Anand Parchure Advocate for the applicant.

Shri M.J. Khan, APP for respondent state.

Shri B.G. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent

University.

CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND A. B.CHAUDHARI, JJ.

DATE : 18^th MARCH 2011.

1.

Heard.

2.

This Court has dismissed the Writ Petition

No.5692 of 2010 adopting the reasons recorded in

Writ Petition No.5768 of 2010. This order is

sought to be reviewed. Annexure-D is the common

judgment delivered in Writ Petition No.5768 of

2010.

3.

This Court has taken a view that the stand

of University in various cases was oscillating. In

certain cases, it gave concession and in certain

2

cases opposed to favour the petitioners concerned.

Petitioner is one such management, whom the

University has declined to favour and has opposed

present petition.

4.

Petitioner

wants

non-discriminate

treatment and wants to be favoured by concession of

university made in similar cases qua respective

petitioners.

5.

This Court, however, found that granting

of such concession itself was not proper and on

merits, the petitioners concerned were not fit for

grant of any indulgence.

6.

In some cases, where the concession was

made and hence, the petitions were partly allowed

does not itself constitute a ground for taking

similar view in other cases when, on merits, this

Court finds that the petition did not deserve any

indulgence.

7.

The ground on which the review is sought

does not constitute a ground falling in the

category of error apparent on the face. If the

petitioners have any other grievance, remedy lies

elsewhere.

8

No indulgence is called for. Review

3

application is dismissed.

Judge

Judge

|muley|