SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT NAGPUR
BHAVANA PREMDEEP MATLANE – Appellant
Versus
PREMDEEP NISHIKANT MATLANE – Respondent


cao260.21.odt 1/2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CIVIL APPLICATION (O) No.260 OF 2021

IN

FAMILY COURT APPEAL STAMP No.2329 OF 2021

(Bhavana Premdeep Matlane Vs. Premdeep Nishikant Matlane)

__________________________________________________________________________

Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram,

appearances, Court'

s orders of directions

Court'

s or Judge'

s orders.

and Registrar'

s Orders.

None for the appellant-applicant.

Shri Hemant Surve, Advocate, for the respondent.

CORAM : A.S. Chandurkar & G.A. Sanap, JJ.

DATE : 20

th July, 2021.

Hearing was conducted through Video

Conferencing and the learned counsels agreed that

the audio and visual quality was proper.

2.

Heard learned Advocate for the

respondent. The learned Advocate for the applicant is

not attending this proceeding since long. The learned

Advocate for the respondent submitted that against

the order impugned in this application the appeal

under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 is not

main

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top