HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
BHAVANA PREMDEEP MATLANE – Appellant
Versus
PREMDEEP NISHIKANT MATLANE – Respondent
FCA 13/2021
fca13.2021judge.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2021
Mrs Bhavana W/o. Premdeep Matlane,
Aged: 30 Yrs., Occ. : Housewife,
R/o. C/o. S. M. Lohar, Kamla Tower
Apartment, Flat No.8, Kaulkhed Road,
Gayatri Nagar, Akola 444002
…..APPELLANT
..VERSUS..
Premdeep S/o. Nishikant Matlane,
Aged about 35 Yrs. Occ.: Govt. Servant,
R/o. N-2, CIDCO, Vithal Nagar,
Aurangabad-431003
….RESPONDENT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
None for the appellant
Shri Hemant Surve, Advocate for respondent
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR AND G. A. SANAP, JJ.
ARGUMENTS WERE HEARD ON : 30.07.2021
JUDGMENT IS PRONOUNCED ON : 27.08.2021
O R A L J U D G M E N T (Per : G. A. Sanap, J.)
In this appeal challenge is to the Judgment and decree
dated 07.12.2020 whereby the learned Judge of the Family Court
granted the decree for judicial separation of the appellant and
respondent for a period of one year.
2]
This appeal can be disposed of in view of the judgment
delivered by this Court in the Family Court Appeal No. 24 of 2020,
fca13.2021judge.odt
2
filed by the husband-respondent herein. The appeal filed by the
husband-respondent herein has been allowed and the prayer for
dissolution of marriage by decree of divorce has been granted.
While granting the decree in the said appeal it has been made
clear that the decree for judicial separation would not survive. It
is further pertinent to note that the appellant and her Advocate
remained absent throughout. In our opinion in view of the order
passed in Family Court Appeal No. 24 of 2020 granting the
decree of divorce, this appeal has become infructuous.
The Family Court Appeal, therefore, stands dismissed
being infructuous
JUDGE
JUDGE
Namrata