HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
M/S. AMBUJA CEMENTS LTD. UPPARWAHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS MINISTRY OF REVENUE AND FOREST AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent
WP 976/2015
['AKSHAY A NAIK', 'HRISHIKESH S CHITALEYHRISHIKESH S CHITALEY', 'HRISHIKESH S CHITALEY', 'G P', '', 'GOVERNMENT PLEADER', 'FOR', 'FOR/R- TO']
wp976.15.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.976/2015
PETITIONER :
M/s. Ambuja Cements Limited, A Company
registered under the Companies Act, 1956,
having its Registered Office at P.O. Ambuja
Nagar, 362715, Tq. Kodinar, Distt : Gir-Somnath
(Gujarat), and Unit Maratha Cement Works,
Site Address at Post Upparwahi, Tahsil-Korpana,
District : Chandrapur- 442908, Maharashtra.
...VERSUS...
RESPONDENTS : 1. The State of Maharashtra, through its
Ministry of Revenue and Forest, Mantralaya,
Madam Cama Road, Mumbai-400 032.
2. Joint District Registrar-cum-Collector
of Stamps, having its office at Administrative
Building, First Floor, Chandrapur.
3. Sub Registrar, Tahsil Office premises,
Rajura, District Chandrapur.
4. The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority,
Maharashtra State, Pune. [Office of Inspector
General of Registration], Ground Floor, New
Administrative Building, Pune 411 001.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. C.S. Kaptan, Senior Counsel with Shri Akshay Naik, Counsel for the
petitioner
Mr. M. G. Bhangde, Senior Counsel with Mrs. Geeta Tiwari, AGP for the
respondents
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
wp976.15.odt
2
CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.
Date of reserving the order : 17/01/2020
Date of pronouncing the order : 04/06/2020
O R D E R
1.
I, had heard learned Senior Counsels for the respective
parties at length and had closed the matter for judgment,
whereupon the Counsel for parties having expressed their intention
to file written notes of arguments in support of the oral submissions
advanced the matter was kept for that purpose. Accordingly the
respondents 1 to 3, have filed their written notes of arguments on
18/3/2020 and the petitioner has filed the same on 30/3/2020.
2.
Certain events being material and admitted they are
stated as under :
(a)
On 19/01/2004 an
application
for
renewal of a mining lease of land admeasuring 579.90
hectares, situate in Rajura Tehsil, granted for the purpose
of extraction of major mineral (lime stone) was made by
the petitioner to the State.
(b)
On 14/9/2009 the Government of
Maharashtra granted renewal of the lease w.e.f.
wp976.15.odt
3
31/12/2004 for 20 years to the petitioner.
(c)
On 24/12/2009 an application was made by
the petitioner to R2/Collector – u/s 31 of Bombay Stamp
Act for adjudication of the proper stamp duty payable
upon the lease.
(d)
On 30/1/2010 an order of adjudication was
passed by the respondent no.2/Collector, whereby the
proper stamp duty payable upon the lease was
adjudicated to Rs.25,75,000/- which amount came to be
deposited by the petitioner on 11/2/10 and the lease
came to be executed on 16/2/2010.
(e)
On 24/2/2010 the lease came to be
registered in favour of the petitioner, which contained
various clauses including one as to how royalty was to be
paid.
(f)
In an audit, objection was raised as to the
quantum of stamp duty calculated and a higher amount
was said to be chargeable.
(g)
On 2/3/2012 a Show-cause-notice
demanding Rs.43,83,915/- as deficit stamp duty was
wp976.15.odt
4
issued to the petitioner as the stamp duty payable was
claimed to be Rs.69,58,918/-.
(h)
On 26/4/2012 a reply was given by the
petitioner opposing the calculation and imposition of the
stamp duty as demanded.
(i)
On 7/5/2012 another notice was received by
the petitioner containing a revised claim demanding
deficit Rs.34,79,160/-.
(j)
On 27/6/2012 a reply was given by the
petitioner inter-alia contending amongst other statements
that the Jt. Registrar had no authority to revise the
amount.
(k)
On 22/6/2012 the petitioner deposited
Rs.34,79,160/- which was claimed to be the deficit, under
protest to